Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MrMoris

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Nov 24, 2015
20
1

mofunk

macrumors 68020
Aug 26, 2009
2,421
161
Americas
If you are afraid then go to a reputable site/dealer. I use a Class 10 Sandisk Ultra with speed of 40MB/S I got when your D5000 came out. The ones that are out now would only read faster when connecting them to the computer. It will not make your camera go faster.

You could save some money and just go with the Sandisk Ultra with 80MB/S or the 40MB/S which is plenty.

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/produ...unc_016g_gn6in_ultra_sd_16gb_card_80mb_s.html
 

MCAsan

macrumors 601
Jul 9, 2012
4,587
442
Atlanta
A fast write speed card comes in handy if you shoot in burst mode and fill the buffer. The camera will be slow to take more frames until the buffer is written to the SD card. So if you are not shooting in fast frame mode for wildlife or sports, a fast write card will not help so much. Personally I would not purchase any card with a write speed under 90MBs. I stick with Lexar from B&H or Adorama.
 

simonsi

Contributor
Jan 3, 2014
4,851
735
Auckland
But I don't see any different


What difference were you expecting? In the camera it will <only> make the camera clear its buffer quicker, meaning you can take longer burst before the card slows the camera shooting speed. If you don't commonly shoot long burst and hit that issue, you wil see no diffetrence.

Out of camera, a faster card should let you copy images to your Mac faster, if you don't take many images to download at one time though, again you won't notice much difference in real usage.
 

rolsskk

macrumors 6502
Sep 1, 2008
300
297

What difference were you expecting? In the camera it will <only> make the camera clear its buffer quicker, meaning you can take longer burst before the card slows the camera shooting speed. If you don't commonly shoot long burst and hit that issue, you wil see no diffetrence.

Out of camera, a faster card should let you copy images to your Mac faster, if you don't take many images to download at one time though, again you won't notice much difference in real usage.
But that's also only if his camera can take advantage of the faster cards. There are some cameras out there that are hindered by their hardware and cannot go the full advertised read/write speed.
 

simonsi

Contributor
Jan 3, 2014
4,851
735
Auckland
But that's also only if his camera can take advantage of the faster cards. There are some cameras out there that are hindered by their hardware and cannot go the full advertised read/write speed.

Slight assumption based on the OPs description of camera and card.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.