...in any case I guess what I am trying to clarify is that if the new revB 120gb just as good as the SSD as far as being fast and all the issues that revA people complain about...this is will be my first mac and i want it to be an awesome experience....I have a mac mini but that is just used for HD movies lol ....detail replies appreciated thanks
The SSD really bumps up the synthetic benchmark values. If you look at various Xbench/GeekBench results, you will see the SSD (really any machine with an SSD) will have a very large bump in that one category; however, *Bench are not your usage patterns. The extra 260 MHz will be almost completely in the noise for day-to-day utility computing, and as the benchmarks show for certain types of I/O, the SSD is just much faster, but whether that translates into a worse/lesser user experience depends somewhat on the user. If you are one that constantly shuts down your machine and reboots and quits applications rather than leaving them running (spaces is your friend esp on lower res machines), and you do a lot of file I/O then you might notice.
Are you trying to justify the price difference between the Rev A refurbs and the Rev B? If you like the machine and it meets your needs, keep it and enjoy it. If you really need the price difference, well then your really need the price difference. I think the reason you see people moving from Rev A HDD to Rev B SSD is that they bought the HDD model of the Rev A to try it out, and they were really sold on the form factor and potential of the machine, but there were initial teething problems (go figure) which burned a lot of folks. When the Rev B came out, they went with the best machine they could get figuring a) the air platform does not lend itself to post-purchase upgrades (memory on mobo, third party hdd replacement options are virtually nil), so they went for the highest trim line AND b) the Rev B with HDDs were not available immediately.