Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

virus1

macrumors 65816
Jun 24, 2004
1,191
0
LOST
were you expecting it? if so, why??

(see my tar for my current facial expression)
 

Jovian9

macrumors 68000
Feb 19, 2003
1,968
110
Planet Zebes
I'm not going to whine about it.........
but I'm waiting for a 12/13" MacBook before I buy another laptop from Apple.
 

QCassidy352

macrumors G5
Mar 20, 2003
12,066
6,107
Bay Area
17" MBP was very much needed and is a very nice release, but the ibooks are 9 months old and really do need to be replaced at this point. Hard to see what the hold up with these things are...
 

BlizzardBomb

macrumors 68030
Jun 15, 2005
2,537
0
England
I thought that most rumor sites agreed that Apple would just have a 13" MacBook to simplify things. The 12" PB was pretty similar to the iBook in specs anyway.
 

direzz

macrumors 6502
Jan 12, 2006
278
0
BlizzardBomb said:
I thought that most rumor sites agreed that Apple would just have a 13" MacBook to simplify things. The 12" PB was pretty similar to the iBook in specs anyway.


but totally different in design.
 

calebjohnston

macrumors 68000
Jan 24, 2006
1,801
1
Just trash this thread. There have been about 50 today that are just retarded.

BTW, The 12" PB has 64mb instead of 32 and the harddrive that comes stock is twice as big, and they aren't built liek flimsy garbage. Not to mention the processor bump, superdrive stock, etc.
 

Mord

macrumors G4
Aug 24, 2003
10,091
23
UK
odd how everyone seems to be assuming that apple is going to kill the 12" powerbook and combine the lines and have a 13" macbook to fill it's place, the 12" powerbook fulfills an important role one that will probably be filled by a 13" MBP and the ibook line will get it's 13" MB.
 

7254278

macrumors 68020
Apr 11, 2004
2,365
0
NYC
calebjohnston said:
Just trash this thread. There have been about 50 today that are just retarded.

BTW, The 12" PB has 64mb instead of 32 and the harddrive that comes stock is twice as big, and they aren't built liek flimsy garbage. Not to mention the processor bump, superdrive stock, etc.
I have to agree with caleb on ths one. Except for the fact that I think iBooks are built pretty well.
 

sam10685

macrumors 68000
Feb 2, 2006
1,763
1
Portland, OR
Jovian9 said:
I'm not going to whine about it.........
but I'm waiting for a 12/13" MacBook before I buy another laptop from Apple.

same here... i want a new laptop but i can wait... in the mean time, i love my G4 12" powerbook.
 

rye9

macrumors 65816
Sep 20, 2005
1,347
77
New York (not NYC)
I'm not upset it wasn't released... heck, I dont even want one, I just think a portable (12") pro laptop would receive much more sales than a 17" laptop... those things are just huge and unnecessary.... its the size of an iMac screen, and those aren't near portable. 17" laptops are just dumb i think.
 

calebjohnston

macrumors 68000
Jan 24, 2006
1,801
1
Eh, I loved my iBook when I had it, but it just didn't feel very stable. The handrests creaked and the hinge bent for no reason and it was just very floppaloppaloppy.
 

QCassidy352

macrumors G5
Mar 20, 2003
12,066
6,107
Bay Area
calebjohnston said:
Just trash this thread. There have been about 50 today that are just retarded.

BTW, The 12" PB has 64mb instead of 32 and the harddrive that comes stock is twice as big, and they aren't built liek flimsy garbage. Not to mention the processor bump, superdrive stock, etc.

the radeon 9550 is a lot better than the 5200go, even if it does have half the VRAM. video performance will still usually be better on the ibook

direzz said:
but totally different in design.

a crucial point. I think it's ridiculous that people say that a MB can replace both the ibook and the 12" powerbook. There need to be small versions of both pro and consumer machines.
 

dmw007

macrumors G4
May 26, 2005
10,635
0
Working for MI-6
QCassidy352 said:
the radeon 9550 is a lot better than the 5200go, even if it does have half the VRAM. video performance will still usually be better on the ibook

a crucial point. I think it's ridiculous that people say that a MB can replace both the ibook and the 12" powerbook. There need to be small versions of both pro and consumer machines.

Good points QCassidy352. Both of these reasons played into my purchasing of my 12" 1.33GHz iBook G4. :)

That said, I am beginning to seriously consider selling my iBook for a MBP. :)
 

milo

macrumors 604
Sep 23, 2003
6,891
523
QCassidy352 said:
17" MBP was very much needed and is a very nice release, but the ibooks are 9 months old and really do need to be replaced at this point. Hard to see what the hold up with these things are...

The hold up is that ALL the mac models need to be replaced this year. It takes time to completely redo every last computer they ship, simple as that.

dmw007 said:
Which means that there is still hope....right? :)

No.

rye9 said:
I'm not upset it wasn't released... heck, I dont even want one, I just think a portable (12") pro laptop would receive much more sales than a 17" laptop... those things are just huge and unnecessary.... its the size of an iMac screen, and those aren't near portable. 17" laptops are just dumb i think.

And I'm sure you know What Would Sell much better than the company who actually sells them. Thanks for letting us bask in your infinite wisdom.

QCassidy352 said:
I think it's ridiculous that people say that a MB can replace both the ibook and the 12" powerbook. There need to be small versions of both pro and consumer machines.

I think it's ridiculous to complain about a product when we know NOTHING about it, particularly which configurations it will ship in.
 

jbooo

macrumors member
Oct 21, 2003
62
0
USA
I agree

Nab runs for a week so there is still time... if it isn't released now and quietly then it will be really soon...
just my .02 cents
But this is a useless thread
:)
 

calebjohnston

macrumors 68000
Jan 24, 2006
1,801
1
The 17" MBP's will have a huge demand. I know quite a few people that are professional photographers and they always had their 17" PB's with them whenever they went on a shoot. It's a portable desktop really. 17" is great for the screen size, and it doesn't need to be small. People needing that size screen have a lot of stuff with them already anyway.
 

dmw007

macrumors G4
May 26, 2005
10,635
0
Working for MI-6
calebjohnston said:
The 17" MBP's will have a huge demand. I know quite a few people that are professional photographers and they always had their 17" PB's with them whenever they went on a shoot. It's a portable desktop really. 17" is great for the screen size, and it doesn't need to be small. People needing that size screen have a lot of stuff with them already anyway.

I agree with you calebjohnston, the 17" MacBook Pro's have their uses and as such, there will be a large demand for them. But for people on the go like me (commuter at college) I need a more portable laptop.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.