Apple's notebooks sell like hotcakes.
Their desktops leave much to be desired.
Apple's notebooks sell like hotcakes.
Their desktops leave much to be desired.
Dual cores at 3.0 GHz are so 2007.Really? I disagree. The iMac range is a very good and capable desktop.
Really? I disagree. The iMac range is a very good and capable desktop.
Really? I disagree. The iMac range is a very good and capable desktop.
Dual cores at 3.0 GHz are so 2007.
I had ready somewhere, and can't remember where, about Apple's likelihood of putting the education market favorite iMac on special by mid-summer to generate more orders for the desktop of choice by schools & home users with students.
This would certainly be welcome news for the schools that wish to add to their current iMac fleets or simply get more desktops into classrooms.
Has anybody read anything like this? What are the chances of this happening, in your opinion?
It's getting tiresome to hear the same apologies for the iMac and the mentions of consumer tasks when you're spending nearly $2,000 and only getting a 3.0 GHz dual core to show for it.3GHz dual-core processor handles consumers tasks more than well. Of course quad-core was needed but maybe Apple wanted to keep distance between Mac Pro and iMac. And quad-core Mac Pro has more options now
It's getting tiresome to hear the same apologies for the iMac and the mentions of consumer tasks when you're spending nearly $2,000 and only getting a 3.0 GHz dual core to show for it.
Next up is going to be that the iMac is prosumer machine as well. You're paying for a desktop bound laptop and it's sad that the iMac has become that.
Apple's notebooks sell like hotcakes.
Their desktops leave much to be desired.
It's getting tiresome to hear the same apologies for the iMac and the mentions of consumer tasks when you're spending nearly $2,000 and only getting a 3.0 GHz dual core to show for it.
Next up is going to be that the iMac is prosumer machine as well. You're paying for a desktop bound laptop and it's sad that the iMac has become that.
It's getting tiresome to hear the same apologies for the iMac and the mentions of consumer tasks when you're spending nearly $2,000 and only getting a 3.0 GHz dual core to show for it.
Next up is going to be that the iMac is prosumer machine as well. You're paying for a desktop bound laptop and it's sad that the iMac has become that.
They aren't since the entire line at least has the passable 9400M G now.It's funny, you act like the Mac Books aren't over priced.
Wonder why only the Books got the price cuts.
It's getting tiresome to hear the same apologies for the iMac and the mentions of consumer tasks when you're spending nearly $2,000 and only getting a 3.0 GHz dual core to show for it.
You're projection outrageous expectations onto me again.And you deserve/expect an apology why?
I just paid $2,000 for my new iMac (2.93 ghz, Radeon 4850) and in my view it was worth every penny. No apologies necessary. Would I preferred to have paid $1,200 for it? Sure. Do I wish it had a quad core? Sure. Would I rather have a $1,200 PC (Windows) with a quad core than my $2,000 iMac with a dual core? No way.
Apple will slash the price/bump the specs when buyers stop seeing value in the machine. Simple economics.
What grows tiresome is hearing people rage against Apple's business model, which seems to be working just fine for them. Unlike some of their competitors (*cough* Dell).
Dell offers the Q8200 on the higher end models of the XPS One as a stock option. The lowest end is still using the E4500. The XPS One isn't that remarkable to be honest even if it is using LGA775 processors. It's in dire of an update.Just a question . . . is there an all in one Intel Quad Core Windows box out there by Dell, HP, Sony . . . ? If there is, I must have missed it.
Quite a few notebooks on NewEgg are using the 2.0 GHz Q9000 Core 2 Quad. At 45W it is cooler than the original E8x35 series.I believe there's a handful of laptops, but we're talking about a desktop all in one, something that's nearly as stylish and functional as an iMac.