Emrtr4 said:Considering that the Macpros PCI E16 slot is double wide (thank you apple) I was wondering if anyone yet knows if it is possible just to add a double wide PC graphics card?
Also, would any OCZ ECC 667 Ram work?
Josias said:Some people that have ordered MacPro's have 6600's and 7800's lying around, and are willing to try 'em out. My guess is that it will work, but I just gotta ask, is the 7950GTX superior to the X1900 or the Quadro FX4500?
The 7950 is like two video cards on 1 card. Im sure Apple has em wide for future stuff like the 7950 and the higher power/heat cards to come.Josias said:Some people that have ordered MacPro's have 6600's and 7800's lying around, and are willing to try 'em out. My guess is that it will work, but I just gotta ask, is the 7950GTX superior to the X1900 or the Quadro FX4500?
HAHHAHAHAHHAHA!kevin.rivers said:The Quadro isn't in the same league as the 7950GTX and the X1900XT. So it cannot be compared realistically.
And I think the X1900 is superior to the 7950GTX
michaeldmartin said:HAHHAHAHAHHAHA!
You're kidding right? NO!
The x1900 is NOWHERE NEAR as good as the 7950GTX
In fact, the 7950GTX is the best consumer card IN THE WORLD.
Josias said:kevin.rivers, what do you mean the nVidia Quadro FX4500 512 MB GDDR3 isn't "in the same league" as other high-end nVidia and ATI cards? According to Applr's test, the Quadro is better than the X1900. I wouldn't know about the X1900XT or the 7950 GX2, but please enlighten me.
BTW, michealdmartin, no reason to troll by laughing at other members. he just though ATI's high end card was better than nVidia's hi-end card. I thought that too.
ChrisG said:What about this?
Whatever gave you that idea ?Josias said:I see the Quadro X4500 X2 has an option for 8 Duallink DVI ports, and also a lot of other craziness. Are you trying to say this is better than X1900XT and 7950 GX2?
BINGO!Glen Quagmire said:PC graphics cards are set up to use a standard BIOS.
Mac Pro graphics cards are set up to use EFI.
Unless you can find some EFI firmware for your PC graphics card, it's not going to work.
Josias said:kevin.rivers, what do you mean the nVidia Quadro FX4500 512 MB GDDR3 isn't "in the same league" as other high-end nVidia and ATI cards? According to Applr's test, the Quadro is better than the X1900. I wouldn't know about the X1900XT or the 7950 GX2, but please enlighten me.
BTW, michealdmartin, no reason to troll by laughing at other members. he just though ATI's high end card was better than nVidia's hi-end card. I thought that too.
Glen Quagmire said:PC graphics cards are set up to use a standard BIOS.
Mac Pro graphics cards are set up to use EFI.
Unless you can find some EFI firmware for your PC graphics card, it's not going to work.
The PCI Express Lanes require configuration...omfgninja said:just a thought....
We know that we DO have a 16x lane to work with, along with other lanes that are decently fast.
And knowing all this, I was kinda suprised that no one bought up the idea of dropping a 7950 into the Mac Pro with the intention of ONLY having it run under windows.
Table 1 Configurable PCI Express Bandwidth
[b]The Mac Pro has 16 PCI Express lanes from the North Bridge and 12 PCI Express lanes from the South Bridge[/b]
PCI Express Slot Default Configuration Alternate Configurations
1 x16, NB x16, NB x8, NB x8, NB
2 x1, SB x1, SB x8, NB x8, NB
3 x4, SB x1, SB x1, SB x4, SB
4 x4, SB x8, SB x8, SB x4, SB
omfgninja said:just a thought....
Being a gamer, and knowing where alot of you are coming from. I know the thought of droping an SLi into my new Mac Pro definetly have crossed my mind many times.
Now, as a disclaimer, Ive never worked with an Intel Mac. But Ive read alot about it, and been following Intel Macs since the MBP was announced. After I saw them announced, I knew I wanted to go ahead and order which ever tower eventualy came out with an Intel chip. That being said, I put my order in this last monday, and have been scouring the forums on more information on the limits of these machines since then.
One of the reasons I desided on this computer, was for games. Thats definetly not the only reason tho, but that being said, I knew I wanted to tune up this computer as much as possible for the games.
Im figuring (as alot of people are) that the use of the 7950 (or other SLi on a single card, boards) is probably dependant on the drives.
We might get drivers, we might not. Who knows.
We know that we DO have a 16x lane to work with, along with other lanes that are decently fast.
And knowing all this, I was kinda suprised that no one bought up the idea of dropping a 7950 into the Mac Pro with the intention of ONLY having it run under windows.
At this point, I see Mac Pro users not having drivers, or any other hacks avaible, a worst case scenario.
But if this did happen, why not just pop that 7950 into the 16x lane slot anyway, and then also have a 7300 in one of your 8x lanes (or even 4x).
While I havent messed around with modern macintosh intel hardware, im sure theres a way (and probably even an easy way) to put in that 7950, and then just disable it in the hardware profiles, so that it doesnt run while the computer is running as a Mac (you would be using the 7300 to display the mac stuff), but then dual boot into Windows in order to use your 7950. While in windows, just install the normal drivers for the 7950
Asuming plugging a "Non-Apple" video card into the Mac Pro, doesnt fry the thing, I dont see how it couldnt hurt it.
Sure, you would have to switch your monitor cable every time you wanted to do your PC Gaming (is there a DVI monitor switcher?)
But having a definet way to run SLi inside your mac, with only a few minor inconvinences beats the hell out of not having it at all.
So yeah? Is this technicaly workable, or??
tipdrill407 said:Wow, that's a long post, i'm trying to understand most of it. The thing is the Mac Pro chipset is not SLI compatibale (Intel 5000x i believe). So you cannot have an SLI or Crossfire setup in the Mac Pro