Apple went over to the dark side when they abandoned the 6502...
Funny, a lot of people consider
Jack Tramiel to be pure evil, and yet for years he not only owned the company that
made the 6502, but used that ownership to his advantage by making
his own competing computer that beat Apple in price hands-down thanks to his market manipulation. But we don't complain about that, do we?
Maybe it's my cross-platformness, as I've been using Macs off and on since system 6.0.8 but really didn't consider myself a "switcher" till a year ago (mainly because at home I used a windows machine until the aftermath of Vista). And I'm pretty well versed with Windows, linux and Mac systems these days, on three different processor lines. So, call me agnostic, but I just don't get the whole processor-as-religion thing. By rights, people who are really hard core old-timer mac users should have been shreeking when OS X hit the scene, as it's really not an entirely Apple-only product. I mean, a command line terminal?
*GASP!* What blasphemy!!
Let's not forget WHY the switch was made: there were problems with the G5's heat generation and power consumption (ever seen a G5 iBook?), and the AIM alliance was slow to come up with the next suitable successor. Apple couldn't wait forever if it wanted to keep growing. And, the switch to Intel made running alternative OSes easier, for those so inclined. No matter what you think about Windows users, I think Apple would still be in a rough spot if it weren't for them, and if it weren't for the switch.
People complain NOW about the MacBook Pro's heat. Imagine the scaldings people would get if it was PowerPC based? And forget about a MacBook Air. Love it or hate it, the MBA
has earned Apple tons of attention.
Nobody's sold their soul to anything. It's just a tiny pile of metal and silicon. All that's changed is how the metal bits are arranged and who's cutting the wafers. And anyway, it seems these days as though for all the hand-wringing people do about Intel, they sure do dance on command for Apple.