Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

palmerc2

macrumors 68000
Original poster
Feb 29, 2008
1,624
684
Los Angeles
One thing I can't figure out is how can Apple and their competitors can be up to their eyeballs in lawsuits against each other, yet Apple uses them to manufacturer parts?

Samsung is (possibly) the sole provider for the new Retina display on the iPad 2. (https://www.macrumors.com/2012/03/13/samsung-sole-supplier-for-retina-display-in-new-ipad/)
Is it just that Samsung will make so much from Apple, that they are able to put those lawsuits aside? Also with Google Maps being used, I know Apple is trying to steer away from it, but couldn't Google just pull the plug on Apple from using its Mapping? They too seem to have a few lawsuits against each other.

There are a few other examples, I just forget what they are right now....but you get the idea.
 

*LTD*

macrumors G4
Feb 5, 2009
10,703
1
Canada
One thing I can't figure out is how can Apple and their competitors can be up to their eyeballs in lawsuits against each other, yet Apple uses them to manufacturer parts?

Different businesses, different divisions. Businesses still operate out of pragmatism, not morality. There is no reason for the latter. It's business. Even when it's business with thieves.
Samsung is (possibly) the sole provider for the new Retina display on the iPad 2. (https://www.macrumors.com/2012/03/13/samsung-sole-supplier-for-retina-display-in-new-ipad/)
Is it just that Samsung will make so much from Apple, that they are able to put those lawsuits aside? Also with Google Maps being used, I know Apple is trying to steer away from it, but couldn't Google just pull the plug on Apple from using its Mapping? They too seem to have a few lawsuits against each other.

There are a few other examples, I just forget what they are right now....but you get the idea.

Companies aren't people.
 

snberk103

macrumors 603
Oct 22, 2007
5,503
91
An Island in the Salish Sea
To expand on *LTD*'s comments....

It's not that they necessarily want to destroy the other company. They just want that company to either 1) Pay for using the patent, or 2) Stop using the patent altogether. But it's not about bankrupting the other company.
 

talmy

macrumors 601
Oct 26, 2009
4,727
337
Oregon
Often what happens is they end up with cross-licensing agreements. This is actually an anti-competitive practice in that they can effectively lock other companies out of the market altogether.
 

kolax

macrumors G3
Mar 20, 2007
9,181
115
I think if Apple had a choice, they'd want to stop using Samsung as a manufacture. But Samsung as a manufacture is one of the best out there.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.