Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

slooksterPSV

macrumors 68040
Original poster
Apr 17, 2004
3,544
306
Nowheresville
Yeah, so I try everything. I used the discs that we have of Vista and I decided to try and install it on my iBook. It's painfully slow; it registers at 295MHz, to install it took about 2 and a half hours. Right now I'm installing VPC tools to see if that speeds anything up.

Yes I believe that the PPC hardware is still good hardware, that it can run the latest and greatest stuff... well Vista may not be in the greatest category, but it looks nice... just an aquafied XP really lol. Anyways, has anyone else tried this?

Specs:
iBook G4 1.33GHz
1GB RAM
Window Vista Premium on VPC
 

Lord Blackadder

macrumors P6
May 7, 2004
15,678
5,511
Sod off
Yeah, you're crazy. :D

You have to be either unencumbered by a need to actually get things done or live a very slow-paced life to run Vista on an iBook.

It reminds me of the time I installed Debian Linux on a Mac IIci...I even compiled the kernel. :eek:
 

slooksterPSV

macrumors 68040
Original poster
Apr 17, 2004
3,544
306
Nowheresville
Here's a screenshot
 

Attachments

  • Picture 2.jpg
    Picture 2.jpg
    165.9 KB · Views: 349

Mr Skills

macrumors 6502a
Nov 21, 2005
803
1
How come you've got the fancy graphics? Doesn't Vista detect that the [virtual] hardware isn't up to spec?



 

slooksterPSV

macrumors 68040
Original poster
Apr 17, 2004
3,544
306
Nowheresville
This is awesome. Why didn't you try using Q or Qemu? That would be much faster without the BS.

Q and Qemu are much slower, sorry to say, I haven't tried Vista on it, but I installed XP on Q and yeah, Q ran a lot slower than if it were on VPC. But I'll import Vista on Q and see if it runs faster, I doubt it, but I'll try.
 

OldSkoolNJ

macrumors 6502
Jul 10, 2006
381
0
There are nerds, and then there are guys who like spending the night in a leather bustier and pink tutu while getting whipped by someone in a poodle costume.


HEY! I thought I told you that in confidence .... I just want to clarify that it was a one time thing! :p

Kevin
 

volvoben

macrumors 6502
Feb 7, 2007
262
0
nowhere fast
How come you've got the fancy graphics? Doesn't Vista detect that the [virtual] hardware isn't up to spec?




Those aren't vista's "aero" graphics, they're just basic graphics. aero has the lame transparency thing. i don't run vista much, if ever, but the regular non-aero graphics look better to me.

If i had a ppc mac, vpc and some free time I'd probably try it too. I do have a penchant for poodle-whipping though...
 

TDM21

macrumors 6502a
Jul 7, 2004
789
0
I've installed Vista a couple of times under VPC on my G4 PowerMac. It did install, but was too slow to be anything usable. I even went into the display and performance settings and turned all the eye candy off; still slow. After about an hour of trying to do the most basic task I gave up. I couldn't get the virtual NIC to work with any driver I tried. Setting VPC to virtual switch didn't work either. I wish I could have dedicated more than 512MB ram to Vista. Its slow enough on a real system running 512MB. I also tried the emulator Q, but it was probably twice as slow as VPC. I think I will stick with 2000 for all of my required Windows needs.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.