I'm looking for a secondary camera for when I don't want to carry my FF Canon camera and have lens.
The use-cases I'm thinking of are on a long hike and want something light and very weather resistant and when attending social events and want a few pictures but don't want the size and weight of FF.
I currently am 100% stills, but am interested in exploring video.
I'm thinking of one of the following combinations: -
Olympus E-M1 Mk.2 plus ED 12–40mm 1:2.8 PRO. This is 856 grams (or maybe the ED 12–100mm 1:4.0 IS PRO 1135 grams).
OR
Panasonic DC-G9 plus Leica 12-60mm f/2.8-4. This is 899 grams.
Based on comments on Youtube it seems they are both very capable cameras. I briefly played with each of them last week and have to agree.
People say the Olympus has better IBIS, worse menus, possibly better auto-focus.
Has anyone had the chance to use and compare these cameras? Are they there are major advantages or disadvantages in real-life usage?
Thank you!
Nicholas
The use-cases I'm thinking of are on a long hike and want something light and very weather resistant and when attending social events and want a few pictures but don't want the size and weight of FF.
I currently am 100% stills, but am interested in exploring video.
I'm thinking of one of the following combinations: -
Olympus E-M1 Mk.2 plus ED 12–40mm 1:2.8 PRO. This is 856 grams (or maybe the ED 12–100mm 1:4.0 IS PRO 1135 grams).
OR
Panasonic DC-G9 plus Leica 12-60mm f/2.8-4. This is 899 grams.
Based on comments on Youtube it seems they are both very capable cameras. I briefly played with each of them last week and have to agree.
People say the Olympus has better IBIS, worse menus, possibly better auto-focus.
Has anyone had the chance to use and compare these cameras? Are they there are major advantages or disadvantages in real-life usage?
Thank you!
Nicholas
Last edited: