It will depend on the system used - what was used for that video?
I just checked. apparently it was some crazy mac pro with hexar coresO_O
Damnn..
Some comment (on a video I cant find) said that Parallels work pretty decent with directx 9! But that it does not work with DX10 or 11. But DX9 it can do. There are still being made modern games (like guild wars 2) that use dx9 by default, so I wonder.
With low settings even in an un-optimized beta, in boot camp a entry sandy bridge intel HD 3000 can run Guild Wars at 25-30 frames per second. Considering how much more powerful an ivy bridge retina macbook pro is, should it be able to do some decent performance?
I ask about virtualization because I had a HDD based Imac back in early 08, and it was great, but it was annoying to boot into windows vista (before 7 was released!) 5-10 times every day to just play a game for 5-30 minutes. Im not the type of gamer who plays for long stretches of time, and gaming is not my first priority, but still important to me, though I dont expect to play demanding games like battlefield 3 or skyrim unless boot camping.
Im just talking about these online gamers were you quickly log in and play and then go about your business!
The difference is that my Imac had a 1 TB HDD. These macbooks have SSD so they should load faster. Maybe boot camping wont be as annoying these days because windows 7 will launch so fast? I could make a 80 gb partition and just use boot camp as a pure steam machine, and do nothing else. I am not sure if its feesable.
I def, want to use OSX for anything else. it would just be great to be able to run a virtualization of some games that dont have crazy particle effects while im doing other stuff on my mac as well. I understand MBP is not a gaming machine. I can justify 2800 dollars on a gaming notebook. Gaming just so happens to be what I like and if I could do all my computing with one laptop, that would be a bliss.