Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

boneca

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Jan 2, 2005
301
1
Boston, MA
Just got my MacBook couple days ago: White, 2GHz C2D, 80GB HD, 1GB RAM. Installed Parallels last night and Vista Home Premium. I did express install so all the setting were set automatically. Parallels allocated 8GB of HD and 512MB of RAM to Vista.
I have to say that performance while running Vista is pretty slow on both sides. I guess 512MB is not really enough for ether of OS.
Installation was flawless.
I ordered 2GB of G.Skill RAM from NewEgg last night and hope that it will increase the performance.

boneca
 

netdog

macrumors 603
Feb 6, 2006
5,760
38
London
I have the same iMac with the same 2GB and find it runs very well. I also find that it runs very well on my MB CD with 2GB. 1GB would not be enough.
 

72930

Retired
May 16, 2006
9,060
4
Ooh. Aah. Home premium isn't really allowed in Parallels...

I am kinda pushing this as I am irritated, but please visit my thread with a problem I have with it...

I have 2Gb on my 24" iMac and Parallels with XP is still...sluggish.

How much RAM have you allocated? , as it really shouldn't be...
 

boneca

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Jan 2, 2005
301
1
Boston, MA
Ooh. Aah. Home premium isn't really allowed in Parallels...

I am kinda pushing this as I am irritated, but please visit my thread with a problem I have with it...

I guess I don't really understand what you trying to say here?
btw Vista never asked me for a password while installing, only parallels asked. So Vista assumes that I'm admin and never asked me for any kind of confiramtions...
 

boneca

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Jan 2, 2005
301
1
Boston, MA
512 or something. It doesn't matter now as I just run XP in Bootcamp now.

that's what I have right now 512MB for Vista and this is not enough (should be enough for XP but still low) I assume u have no problems with OSX with 1.5GB.
Anyway give XP 1GB and I assume it will work better.
 

rogersmj

macrumors 68020
Sep 10, 2006
2,169
36
Indianapolis, IN
I run XP constantly in Parallels ever since I got 2GB of RAM in my iMac, with 384MB devoted to XP. It runs great. Remember when XP came out a top of the line computer had no more than 256MB of RAM. As long as you're only running a couple apps 256MB-512MB should be plenty.
 

failsafe1

macrumors 6502a
Jul 21, 2003
621
1
Do you have XP anywhere? This could be a case of VISTA needing more resource than you have.
 

MacVault

macrumors 65816
Jun 10, 2002
1,144
59
Planet Earth
VMware runs better than Parallels with 1GB

I tried Parallels too on my MacBook C2D 1GB. Then I tried VMware Fusion and it seems to me that VMware manages the memory better, or for some reason doesn't seem to make the OS X envrionment so slow when switching between environments. Parallels is nice, but I'm really looking forward to the official VMware Fusion release.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.