A smartphone is a device that consumes a lot of power... put it in a wrist... you can't have both...
And still it has 2 days of battery life, which is more than a lot of other smart watches.
----------
I don't understand why anyone would want a keyboard and web browser on their wrist. That is ridiculous, IMO.
The screen resolution is higher than the 1st gen iPhone. And if I remember correctly there was no problem surfing or using the on-screen keyboard on that one.
You can of course use voice instead of typing if you want to like most modern people do these days.
----------
The writer's entire complaint is based around the fact that it requires a Galaxy phone to setup the device.
I agree - it is a laughable review - and Engadet deservedly gets their a** handed to them in the comments section.
The main point with a device like the Gear S is of course to be an extention of your phone like most other smart watches. No one buys it just to use it as their one and only cell phone, which seems to be the very odd premise for the whole review.
But it has built in GPS and the possibility to pop in a SIM card so you can use it as a stand alone device that has the basic functionality of a cell phone (and more) without your 'main' phone needing to be in bluetooth-distance all the time. I think the idea is great - I hate running or hiking with my phone just to be able to track speed/distance or to listen to music. With the Gear S I could leave the phone at home and still be available if anything important comes up.