Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

boss.king

macrumors 603
Apr 8, 2009
6,392
7,646
If this is for buying advice, I'd recommend an i5, it's the best bang for your buck and handles most tasks just as well as an i7, unless you are really pushing it hard.

If it's just out of interest, disregard my post.
 

Zwhaler

macrumors 604
Jun 10, 2006
7,265
1,963
If this is for buying advice, I'd recommend an i5, it's the best bang for your buck and handles most tasks just as well as an i7, unless you are really pushing it hard.

If it's just out of interest, disregard my post.

True except for the MacBook Pros, the i7 is significantly faster and has twice the number of cores on the 15" and 17". In the iMacs the 2.8 i5 is closer to the i7 models.
 

boss.king

macrumors 603
Apr 8, 2009
6,392
7,646
True except for the MacBook Pros, the i7 is significantly faster and has twice the number of cores on the 15" and 17". In the iMacs the 2.8 i5 is closer to the i7 models.

Doesn't that only make a difference if programs are made to take advantage of all 4 cores?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.