Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

8baal

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Apr 23, 2008
7
0
I originally purchased a mid-2007 20" 2.4ghz iMac, and just last week "traded it in" for a brand-new 24" 2.8ghz iMac. Long story there... I had upgraded the memory from 1gb to 4gb, and on the new one (which came with 2gb) up to 4gb. So I was hoping I was comparing apples to apples... so to speak.

The question is does it seem like the new 2.8ghz ought to be faster than the 2.4ghz? I realize I could get flamed for asking a silly question like that, especially when I've used Macintosh since the Mac Plus, but I was really expecting a significant upgrade in speeds.
 
Well, you are only gaining around a 16% increase in processor speeds - that's hardly noteworthy unless you are doing processor-heavy items like video encoding. I'm not at all surprised that you don't feel like its much faster than your 2.4 Ghz was, it really isn't.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.