Having Samsung's new flagship nearby, I have proceeded to compare both devices with the intention of seeing which of the two has a better camera.
The Samsung has more lenses than the Pixel. It has with a 200 megapixel main camera, already seen in previous generations, a 12 megapixel ultra wide angle, a 10 megapixel 3X optical zoom and a new 50 megapixel 5x zoom that promises a 10X zoom without loss of quality.
On the Pixel, meanwhile, we have a 50-megapixel main camera with 2x "optical" quality zoom, a 48-megapixel ultra wide-angle and a 48-megapixel 5x zoom that also promises up to 10X "optical" zoom without loss of quality.
Apart from the specifications, where the high end always has the latest in photo sensors, the important thing is the processing of the same.
Both phones are updated to the latest versions of the system on that day. The S24 Ultra has not yet received any updates at the time of shooting, so it comes with the factory software, and the Pixel had not received the February update that came out last Monday/Tuesday.
Both phones shot at 50 megapixels all the pictures. As was the case with the OnePlus 11, the Samsung shoots much faster photos, as well as processing them, as the Pixel, even in daylight, takes a long time to shutter, take the photo and process the photo, taking even around a minute to process the photo taken.
Focusing on the photography as such, let's go analyzing one by one the ones we took with both phones. On the left the Samsung S24 Ultra and on the right the Pixel 8 Pro.
The first photo, at 1X, during sunset, we observe two very good photos. The Pixel gives a bit more contrast to the scene and tends towards a warmer tonality, while the Samsung uses somewhat more saturated tones.
In terms of sharpness and detail, the Pixel is somewhat better than the Samsung.
In this shot, both photos are similar, so I don't consider there to be any clear winner. I personally like the "look" of the Pixel one better.
The second photo is with the 5X zoom in the same place. Here we see that the Pixel clearly does a better job with HDR, taking a clearer picture, without actually burning out the sky. The Samsung, also shows a number of "artifacts" in the sky, something that is not apparent in the Pixel. In detail and sharpness, the Pixel is noticeably better, as the Samsung shows details somewhat "washed out", while I find the Pixel's sharpness and definition better.
In this shot I'm sticking with the Pixel.
The next shot, at 1X, again I see it very similar on both devices. Good detail and sharpness in both, the colors perhaps slightly more saturated in the Samsung, but nothing exaggerated. Where I do notice a difference is in the HDR, since the Pixel photo manages to see the inside of the dome, while in the Samsung it looks completely black.
As with the first picture, I don't consider there to be any winners, but personally I'll go with the Pixel.
The next one, taken at 5X, we observe that the Pixel again does a better job with HDR, giving more light to the dark parts, although the Samsung offers a higher contrast and a more saturated and warmer tonality. The control of the lights I see it better worked in the Pixel, especially if we look at the headlights of cars or the sky.
In terms of detail and sharpness, I consider the Pixel to be a step above the Samsung, since if we enlarge the photograph to the Volkswagen Lupo area, it allows us to perfectly observe the license plate on the Pixel, while on the Samsung it is much more blurred. The detail of the Volkswagen is noticeably greater on the Pixel compared to the Samsung.
Therefore, personally, I'm sticking with the one on the Pixel.
In the next photograph, taken at 3X, we note that similar work on both devices. The Pixel has a slightly warmer tonality and the HDR works slightly better on the Pixel, as the trees are better appreciated on the Google Pixel. At the level of detail and sharpness I also see them quite similar, perhaps slightly better the Pixel. At the color level, the Samsung has the most vivid colors compared to the Pixel.
In this case, both photos look similar to me, and both look good to me. Perhaps I like the Pixel's a little better because of the HDR work.
This photograph taken with the 0.5x, again highlights the good HDR work of the Pixel, offering much more clarity to the dark areas. We also note a warmer tone in the Pixel compared to the Samsung, although the Samsung has more vivid colors.
Both distort the image somewhat in the corners, although the Pixel I think it is more noticeable, clearly losing definition and detail, looking even blurry, something that does not seem to be appreciated in the Samsung.
In this case I would stick with the Samsung for the lower distortion.
The same scene, at 1X. We observe exactly the same as in the previous cases. More vivid colors in the Samsung, warmer scene in the Pixel. We also find more detail and sharpness in the Pixel.
Both photos are very good and similar, but again I'll take the Pixel for the HDR work and the extra sharpness and detail.
The next photo, at 10X, allows us to see a pretty good overall scene in both. Again, the Pixel lifts the highlights more, with more intense HDR work, while the Samsung opts for more contrast and color vibrancy.
Zooming in, we see that the Samsung has more detail and sharpness over the Pixel.
In this shot, I'm sticking with the Samsung.
The next shot, at 30X, allows us to see that the Samsung gets a better image. The antenna is seen with obviously better detail and sharpness. Again, the colors are more vivid on the Samsung and the Pixel's scene is warmer than the Korean model.
I'm sticking with the Samsung again.
The next photo, at 5X, lets you see that the Pixel offers slightly more detail and sharpness. The colors on the Samsung are somewhat more vivid and the tonality cooler than on the Pixel.
If we zoom in, we notice that the pigeon on the Pixel has more detail and looks better, but it also looks like some strange shadows where the beak area.
However, in this shot I'll stick with the Samsung.
The next shot, already with barely any light, at 1X, we again see a great HDR job by the Pixel, bringing out more information from the lower trees. Colors are more vivid on the Samsung.
In this photograph I'm sticking with the Pixel.
The next photograph, at 1X, again shows us a similar situation. More color vibrancy in the Samsung, slightly more shadows in the Pixel, although both seem to show similar contrast, although the Pixel offers slightly more brightness in the staircase area.
Enlarging the photograph a bit, again we can appreciate a slightly greater detail and sharpness in the Pixel.
As in other photographs, the result is quite similar and I find it hard to decide for one or the other, perhaps in this one I would go with the Samsung for the colors and contrast.
The next shot, in 3X, the Samsung takes off chest in terms of sharpness and definition, noticing already the digital zoom of the Pixel with respect to the optical zoom of the Samsung. As can be seen when zoomed in, the Pixel loses quite a bit of detail with the 3X zoom, while the Samsung offers more than adequate detail and sharpness for the low light at the time.
In this picture I'm sticking with the Samsung.
With the 5X, the Samsung has slightly more detail, but less sharpness than the Pixel. However, the Pixel suffers from more noise compared to the Samsung.
The Samsung saturates the colors more, with the marquee looking more saturated than the Pixel.
In this photograph I would go with the Samsung.
The next photograph, taken at 1X, we again observe a greater saturation of colors in the Samsung, as well as a warmer tone in the Korean with respect to the American model.
The Pixel has more detail, but less sharpness than the Samsung, as well as more noise in the scene, again.
In this photo I'm sticking with the Samsung again.
A photo of the last few minutes of light, with the 5X zoom. The Pixel pulls HDR but makes the scene look weird and with lots and lots of noise. The opposite happens in the Samsung, which performs an absolute contrast and barely lets you see anything.
The colors on the Samsung are much warmer and more saturated than on the Pixel, perhaps in this case excessive, since the sky did not look like that on the Pixel. On the Pixel, however, they are too muted, with the scene not being 100% the real thing either.
In terms of detail and sharpness, the Samsung does much better.
Without liking either picture, I find the Samsung one better.
Same scene, 30X zoom. Again, the Pixel can do little about the Samsung's zoom. While the Pixel shows the towers completely blurred, the Samsung manages a more or less "decent" shot.
The excessively saturated and warm colors of the Samsung and the strange HDR of the Pixel, giving much more noise to the dark areas, are again repeated again in this photograph.
Again, the Samsung wins again in this case.
New scene, at 1X. Now things change again. The Pixel offers a darker and warmer scene, with higher contrast. The Samsung has the more vivid colors again and pulls HDR to give more light, generating strange artifacts that are perfectly noticeable in the trees and tower.
In terms of sharpness and detail the Samsung is a little above the Pixel, but the HDR or night mode (because they were in automatic mode) completely destroys the photograph.
In this photograph I'm sticking with the Pixel.
With the 2X zoom, we observe something similar to the previous case, although the HDR in the Samsung is quite less noticeable than in the previous case.
Again, I'm sticking with the Pixel.
Another scene, at 1X, we can see that on the Samsung, as night falls, it tends to saturate the colors more and opt for a warmer tonality, while the Pixel tends towards cooler tones.
The Samsung brings out a bit more information from the trees, but overall it is a fairly similar photo in terms of detail and sharpness, although in these aspects, the Samsung is a point above. However, at the top the Samsung starts to bring out noise, blurring the top of the photo, something that doesn't happen on the Pixel.
Neither photo would make anyone fall in love, but I think I'd opt for the Pixel's, for the less saturated and somewhat more realistic colors.
In the next shot with the 5X, we note that, unlike in the previous photographs, it is now the Samsung that pulls the lights up to give some information from the tree, while the Pixel opts for a completely contrasted and dark image.
HDR is somewhat noticeable on the Samsung, on the Pixel too, but somewhat less so. The Samsung's colors are more saturated and warmer than the Pixel's colors.
In this case, I think I'd go with the Pixel photo.
Photo already completely at night, with the 5X zoom. In this case we note that the Pixel brings out a little more light and, above all, definition and detail. The Pixel also has slightly more noise than the Samsung.
The lights on the Pixel are better controlled.
In this photograph, I'm sticking with the Pixel.
Zooming in on the nearest houses with 10X, we note that the Pixel does a far inferior job than its rival. We note that the terrace on the Samsung is shown completely crisp and with great detail and sharpness, while on the Pixel it's all quite blurry.
Clearly, the Samsung's photography in this case is noticeably better, so it wins in this case.
Next photograph of the Deboh Temple, at 1X. This time we notice that the Samsung controls the highlights better, as the Pixel overexposes the scene too much. In return, the Pixel offers a little more information of the environment, but not much more than the Samsung.
When we enlarge the photo we observe that the Samsung has better detail and sharpness of the details of the monument. The Samsung saturates much more than the Pixel, in addition to tending to a warmer tonality.
In this photo I'm sticking with the Samsung.
The next photo, at 3X, we again appreciate a strange work of the Samsung. The photo in terms of detail and sharpness is correct, but I don't know if it's because of the 10MP 3X sensor or the night mode, or a combination of both factors, the scene comes out with a lot of noise.
In contrast, the Pixel makes a photograph with a good level of quality, both at the level of lights (it does not overexpose), as well as sharpness and detail.
In this case, the winner is clearly the Pixel.
The next shot at 2X, we note that the Samsung tends toward a warmer, more saturated tone. The Samsung in the building at the end overexposes a bit more relative to the Pixel.
In terms of definition and sharpness both are very similar, perhaps slightly superior the Samsung.
I'd go with the Pixel's for the more natural tones, but both scenes are virtually identical.
The next picture, taken at 5X, shows a great job of the Samsung at night, controlling the lights better, not making weird flashes like the Google Pixel. Also in sharpness and detail the Samsung wins over the Pixel. Samsung again has more saturation and the scene is slightly warmer.
In this shot I'm sticking with the Samsung.
The next picture is at 1X, we notice that the Samsung in this case gives more light to the scene, overexposing in some areas. The Pixel offers a darker image, but with better light control.
In terms of detail sharpness and detail, the Samsung gives us somewhat excessive detail and sharpness, looking somewhat unreal and more "colored" relative to the more realistic Pixel.
In this photograph I'm sticking with the Pixel.
Photographing the Royal Palace and the Almudena Cathedral, at 1X, we have a similar photograph at first glance.
The Samsung again tends to tend to more saturated and warmer colors and makes a strange tonality in the sky (I do not know if it is because of the night mode and light pollution of Madrid or something of the software itself).
However, in detail we appreciate that, unlike the previous photo, in this case it is the Pixel that does a job of exaggerated sharpness and detail that colors the image, while the Samsung offers a cleaner and more realistic image. It also controls the cathedral lights better.
In this picture, I'm sticking with the Samsung.
With the 3x zoom, we observe something similar to the previous image. This time the reflection of the light from the sky on the Samsung is less pronounced than in the previous photo and, again, it again controls the lights better than the Pixel.
If we look at the darkest area of the Royal Palace, we see that the Pixel barely gets any information out of that area, everything being smeared and with lots and lots of noise, while the Samsung keeps the scene much better controlled in all areas.
Again, I'm sticking with the Samsung.
The last picture of the comparison, with the 5X zoom, looks similar to the previous ones. The Samsung on this occasion has slightly more noise, but makes up for it with better controlled sharpness and detail than on the Pixel, which is again too aggressive for my taste.
Therefore, we can conclude that both cameras are very good. By day, with the 1X, perhaps the Pixel is somewhat superior, especially for the spectacular work it does with HDR. In ultra wide-angle, the Samsung is superior, as it is in zoom beyond 5X.
At night we start to find somewhat contradictory results. Sometimes the Pixel does a very bad job, other times it's the Samsung, sometimes it comes out a very good photo, other times garbage.
The issue of automatic mode and night mode has caused these situations to be generated, perhaps. Also say that at night, between how long it takes the Pixel to shoot the photo in 50MP and the night mode, makes it very difficult to hold the phone at hand during the 3/4 seconds it usually takes, so it is always advisable to take at least two photos to avoid unpleasant surprises. It would also be advisable to bring a tripod, to maintain a better stabilization during night photography.
At night, generally speaking, I would give a win to the Samsung, as the Pixel tends to overexpose the lights too much.
So, we have two ways of taking pictures, one more colorful and with more options, with the Samsung, in which it sometimes sins of over-processing and, on the other hand, we have the Pixel, which in daytime I still find almost unbeatable, but at night perhaps they should work with the issue of exposure of strong lights, since the Samsung with general character has done a better job there.
The Samsung has more lenses than the Pixel. It has with a 200 megapixel main camera, already seen in previous generations, a 12 megapixel ultra wide angle, a 10 megapixel 3X optical zoom and a new 50 megapixel 5x zoom that promises a 10X zoom without loss of quality.
On the Pixel, meanwhile, we have a 50-megapixel main camera with 2x "optical" quality zoom, a 48-megapixel ultra wide-angle and a 48-megapixel 5x zoom that also promises up to 10X "optical" zoom without loss of quality.
Apart from the specifications, where the high end always has the latest in photo sensors, the important thing is the processing of the same.
Both phones are updated to the latest versions of the system on that day. The S24 Ultra has not yet received any updates at the time of shooting, so it comes with the factory software, and the Pixel had not received the February update that came out last Monday/Tuesday.
Both phones shot at 50 megapixels all the pictures. As was the case with the OnePlus 11, the Samsung shoots much faster photos, as well as processing them, as the Pixel, even in daylight, takes a long time to shutter, take the photo and process the photo, taking even around a minute to process the photo taken.
Focusing on the photography as such, let's go analyzing one by one the ones we took with both phones. On the left the Samsung S24 Ultra and on the right the Pixel 8 Pro.
The first photo, at 1X, during sunset, we observe two very good photos. The Pixel gives a bit more contrast to the scene and tends towards a warmer tonality, while the Samsung uses somewhat more saturated tones.
In terms of sharpness and detail, the Pixel is somewhat better than the Samsung.
In this shot, both photos are similar, so I don't consider there to be any clear winner. I personally like the "look" of the Pixel one better.
The second photo is with the 5X zoom in the same place. Here we see that the Pixel clearly does a better job with HDR, taking a clearer picture, without actually burning out the sky. The Samsung, also shows a number of "artifacts" in the sky, something that is not apparent in the Pixel. In detail and sharpness, the Pixel is noticeably better, as the Samsung shows details somewhat "washed out", while I find the Pixel's sharpness and definition better.
In this shot I'm sticking with the Pixel.
The next shot, at 1X, again I see it very similar on both devices. Good detail and sharpness in both, the colors perhaps slightly more saturated in the Samsung, but nothing exaggerated. Where I do notice a difference is in the HDR, since the Pixel photo manages to see the inside of the dome, while in the Samsung it looks completely black.
As with the first picture, I don't consider there to be any winners, but personally I'll go with the Pixel.
The next one, taken at 5X, we observe that the Pixel again does a better job with HDR, giving more light to the dark parts, although the Samsung offers a higher contrast and a more saturated and warmer tonality. The control of the lights I see it better worked in the Pixel, especially if we look at the headlights of cars or the sky.
In terms of detail and sharpness, I consider the Pixel to be a step above the Samsung, since if we enlarge the photograph to the Volkswagen Lupo area, it allows us to perfectly observe the license plate on the Pixel, while on the Samsung it is much more blurred. The detail of the Volkswagen is noticeably greater on the Pixel compared to the Samsung.
Therefore, personally, I'm sticking with the one on the Pixel.
In the next photograph, taken at 3X, we note that similar work on both devices. The Pixel has a slightly warmer tonality and the HDR works slightly better on the Pixel, as the trees are better appreciated on the Google Pixel. At the level of detail and sharpness I also see them quite similar, perhaps slightly better the Pixel. At the color level, the Samsung has the most vivid colors compared to the Pixel.
In this case, both photos look similar to me, and both look good to me. Perhaps I like the Pixel's a little better because of the HDR work.
This photograph taken with the 0.5x, again highlights the good HDR work of the Pixel, offering much more clarity to the dark areas. We also note a warmer tone in the Pixel compared to the Samsung, although the Samsung has more vivid colors.
Both distort the image somewhat in the corners, although the Pixel I think it is more noticeable, clearly losing definition and detail, looking even blurry, something that does not seem to be appreciated in the Samsung.
In this case I would stick with the Samsung for the lower distortion.
The same scene, at 1X. We observe exactly the same as in the previous cases. More vivid colors in the Samsung, warmer scene in the Pixel. We also find more detail and sharpness in the Pixel.
Both photos are very good and similar, but again I'll take the Pixel for the HDR work and the extra sharpness and detail.
The next photo, at 10X, allows us to see a pretty good overall scene in both. Again, the Pixel lifts the highlights more, with more intense HDR work, while the Samsung opts for more contrast and color vibrancy.
Zooming in, we see that the Samsung has more detail and sharpness over the Pixel.
In this shot, I'm sticking with the Samsung.
The next shot, at 30X, allows us to see that the Samsung gets a better image. The antenna is seen with obviously better detail and sharpness. Again, the colors are more vivid on the Samsung and the Pixel's scene is warmer than the Korean model.
I'm sticking with the Samsung again.
The next photo, at 5X, lets you see that the Pixel offers slightly more detail and sharpness. The colors on the Samsung are somewhat more vivid and the tonality cooler than on the Pixel.
If we zoom in, we notice that the pigeon on the Pixel has more detail and looks better, but it also looks like some strange shadows where the beak area.
However, in this shot I'll stick with the Samsung.
The next shot, already with barely any light, at 1X, we again see a great HDR job by the Pixel, bringing out more information from the lower trees. Colors are more vivid on the Samsung.
In this photograph I'm sticking with the Pixel.
The next photograph, at 1X, again shows us a similar situation. More color vibrancy in the Samsung, slightly more shadows in the Pixel, although both seem to show similar contrast, although the Pixel offers slightly more brightness in the staircase area.
Enlarging the photograph a bit, again we can appreciate a slightly greater detail and sharpness in the Pixel.
As in other photographs, the result is quite similar and I find it hard to decide for one or the other, perhaps in this one I would go with the Samsung for the colors and contrast.
The next shot, in 3X, the Samsung takes off chest in terms of sharpness and definition, noticing already the digital zoom of the Pixel with respect to the optical zoom of the Samsung. As can be seen when zoomed in, the Pixel loses quite a bit of detail with the 3X zoom, while the Samsung offers more than adequate detail and sharpness for the low light at the time.
In this picture I'm sticking with the Samsung.
With the 5X, the Samsung has slightly more detail, but less sharpness than the Pixel. However, the Pixel suffers from more noise compared to the Samsung.
The Samsung saturates the colors more, with the marquee looking more saturated than the Pixel.
In this photograph I would go with the Samsung.
The next photograph, taken at 1X, we again observe a greater saturation of colors in the Samsung, as well as a warmer tone in the Korean with respect to the American model.
The Pixel has more detail, but less sharpness than the Samsung, as well as more noise in the scene, again.
In this photo I'm sticking with the Samsung again.
A photo of the last few minutes of light, with the 5X zoom. The Pixel pulls HDR but makes the scene look weird and with lots and lots of noise. The opposite happens in the Samsung, which performs an absolute contrast and barely lets you see anything.
The colors on the Samsung are much warmer and more saturated than on the Pixel, perhaps in this case excessive, since the sky did not look like that on the Pixel. On the Pixel, however, they are too muted, with the scene not being 100% the real thing either.
In terms of detail and sharpness, the Samsung does much better.
Without liking either picture, I find the Samsung one better.
Same scene, 30X zoom. Again, the Pixel can do little about the Samsung's zoom. While the Pixel shows the towers completely blurred, the Samsung manages a more or less "decent" shot.
The excessively saturated and warm colors of the Samsung and the strange HDR of the Pixel, giving much more noise to the dark areas, are again repeated again in this photograph.
Again, the Samsung wins again in this case.
New scene, at 1X. Now things change again. The Pixel offers a darker and warmer scene, with higher contrast. The Samsung has the more vivid colors again and pulls HDR to give more light, generating strange artifacts that are perfectly noticeable in the trees and tower.
In terms of sharpness and detail the Samsung is a little above the Pixel, but the HDR or night mode (because they were in automatic mode) completely destroys the photograph.
In this photograph I'm sticking with the Pixel.
With the 2X zoom, we observe something similar to the previous case, although the HDR in the Samsung is quite less noticeable than in the previous case.
Again, I'm sticking with the Pixel.
Another scene, at 1X, we can see that on the Samsung, as night falls, it tends to saturate the colors more and opt for a warmer tonality, while the Pixel tends towards cooler tones.
The Samsung brings out a bit more information from the trees, but overall it is a fairly similar photo in terms of detail and sharpness, although in these aspects, the Samsung is a point above. However, at the top the Samsung starts to bring out noise, blurring the top of the photo, something that doesn't happen on the Pixel.
Neither photo would make anyone fall in love, but I think I'd opt for the Pixel's, for the less saturated and somewhat more realistic colors.
In the next shot with the 5X, we note that, unlike in the previous photographs, it is now the Samsung that pulls the lights up to give some information from the tree, while the Pixel opts for a completely contrasted and dark image.
HDR is somewhat noticeable on the Samsung, on the Pixel too, but somewhat less so. The Samsung's colors are more saturated and warmer than the Pixel's colors.
In this case, I think I'd go with the Pixel photo.
Photo already completely at night, with the 5X zoom. In this case we note that the Pixel brings out a little more light and, above all, definition and detail. The Pixel also has slightly more noise than the Samsung.
The lights on the Pixel are better controlled.
In this photograph, I'm sticking with the Pixel.
Zooming in on the nearest houses with 10X, we note that the Pixel does a far inferior job than its rival. We note that the terrace on the Samsung is shown completely crisp and with great detail and sharpness, while on the Pixel it's all quite blurry.
Clearly, the Samsung's photography in this case is noticeably better, so it wins in this case.
Next photograph of the Deboh Temple, at 1X. This time we notice that the Samsung controls the highlights better, as the Pixel overexposes the scene too much. In return, the Pixel offers a little more information of the environment, but not much more than the Samsung.
When we enlarge the photo we observe that the Samsung has better detail and sharpness of the details of the monument. The Samsung saturates much more than the Pixel, in addition to tending to a warmer tonality.
In this photo I'm sticking with the Samsung.
The next photo, at 3X, we again appreciate a strange work of the Samsung. The photo in terms of detail and sharpness is correct, but I don't know if it's because of the 10MP 3X sensor or the night mode, or a combination of both factors, the scene comes out with a lot of noise.
In contrast, the Pixel makes a photograph with a good level of quality, both at the level of lights (it does not overexpose), as well as sharpness and detail.
In this case, the winner is clearly the Pixel.
The next shot at 2X, we note that the Samsung tends toward a warmer, more saturated tone. The Samsung in the building at the end overexposes a bit more relative to the Pixel.
In terms of definition and sharpness both are very similar, perhaps slightly superior the Samsung.
I'd go with the Pixel's for the more natural tones, but both scenes are virtually identical.
The next picture, taken at 5X, shows a great job of the Samsung at night, controlling the lights better, not making weird flashes like the Google Pixel. Also in sharpness and detail the Samsung wins over the Pixel. Samsung again has more saturation and the scene is slightly warmer.
In this shot I'm sticking with the Samsung.
The next picture is at 1X, we notice that the Samsung in this case gives more light to the scene, overexposing in some areas. The Pixel offers a darker image, but with better light control.
In terms of detail sharpness and detail, the Samsung gives us somewhat excessive detail and sharpness, looking somewhat unreal and more "colored" relative to the more realistic Pixel.
In this photograph I'm sticking with the Pixel.
Photographing the Royal Palace and the Almudena Cathedral, at 1X, we have a similar photograph at first glance.
The Samsung again tends to tend to more saturated and warmer colors and makes a strange tonality in the sky (I do not know if it is because of the night mode and light pollution of Madrid or something of the software itself).
However, in detail we appreciate that, unlike the previous photo, in this case it is the Pixel that does a job of exaggerated sharpness and detail that colors the image, while the Samsung offers a cleaner and more realistic image. It also controls the cathedral lights better.
In this picture, I'm sticking with the Samsung.
With the 3x zoom, we observe something similar to the previous image. This time the reflection of the light from the sky on the Samsung is less pronounced than in the previous photo and, again, it again controls the lights better than the Pixel.
If we look at the darkest area of the Royal Palace, we see that the Pixel barely gets any information out of that area, everything being smeared and with lots and lots of noise, while the Samsung keeps the scene much better controlled in all areas.
Again, I'm sticking with the Samsung.
The last picture of the comparison, with the 5X zoom, looks similar to the previous ones. The Samsung on this occasion has slightly more noise, but makes up for it with better controlled sharpness and detail than on the Pixel, which is again too aggressive for my taste.
Therefore, we can conclude that both cameras are very good. By day, with the 1X, perhaps the Pixel is somewhat superior, especially for the spectacular work it does with HDR. In ultra wide-angle, the Samsung is superior, as it is in zoom beyond 5X.
At night we start to find somewhat contradictory results. Sometimes the Pixel does a very bad job, other times it's the Samsung, sometimes it comes out a very good photo, other times garbage.
The issue of automatic mode and night mode has caused these situations to be generated, perhaps. Also say that at night, between how long it takes the Pixel to shoot the photo in 50MP and the night mode, makes it very difficult to hold the phone at hand during the 3/4 seconds it usually takes, so it is always advisable to take at least two photos to avoid unpleasant surprises. It would also be advisable to bring a tripod, to maintain a better stabilization during night photography.
At night, generally speaking, I would give a win to the Samsung, as the Pixel tends to overexpose the lights too much.
So, we have two ways of taking pictures, one more colorful and with more options, with the Samsung, in which it sometimes sins of over-processing and, on the other hand, we have the Pixel, which in daytime I still find almost unbeatable, but at night perhaps they should work with the issue of exposure of strong lights, since the Samsung with general character has done a better job there.
