I really just like the quality of an iPhone 1. It's pretty terrible but it gives it a certain look that I think is really nice. It's almost like using an old digital camera, before they really started revving up the technology and now they're super crisp. Almost like film, in a way, when it doesn't turn out perfect. Gives it more of a realistic sense, rather than just a photo and an artform. The way it blurs everything together, I just like it a lot. I don't know why, realistically a super high quality photo is beautiful and appealing to look at, but the low quality almost makes it seem like a painting rather than a photograph.
I'm not trying to give an excuse to the iPhone 1 having a terrible camera though, and I doubt that's what Apple was trying to do. They should have released a better camera if they were able to, they say they only like to release the best and use the highest end things, but the competition's camera was better quality, most likely had focusing, and probably even had a flash. But I'm glad it was terrible. Thenagain this is coming from someone who thinks the NES graphics are better looking than Xbox360.
That's why I'm only allowing iPhone 1s in this though, iPhone 3 and beyond are too high quality, might as well just add those to the Photography thread I made before.