Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Do These Pictures Accurately Represent What You Think the New iMac Will Look Like?

  • Totally

    Votes: 5 3.8%
  • Mostly

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Somewhat

    Votes: 1 0.8%
  • Not Really

    Votes: 10 7.6%
  • Not At All

    Votes: 115 87.8%

  • Total voters
    131

GodBless

macrumors 65816
Original poster
Jan 22, 2005
1,004
0
Note: Please read this post including my design intent and the voting rules before you vote.

Here are some pictures of what I think the new iMac will look like (as far as its basic shape is concerned--more pictures are posted on my next post):

Isometric 1:
attachment.php


Right Side:
attachment.php


Left Side:
attachment.php


Front Side:
attachment.php


Back Side:
attachment.php


Voting guidelines for the following answers to the question "Do These Pictures (Posted in my First Two Posts of This Thread) Accurately Represent What You Think the New iMac Will Look Like?:
- Totally - This answer means that you think that the iMac will have the same basic shape that are represented in the models that I posted.
- Mostly - This answer means that you think that the iMac will look mostly like what the designs that I posted look like. (Possible reasons why you might choose this answer)
- Somewhat - This answer means that the iMac models that I posted barely look like what you had in mind.
- Not Really - This answer means that you had quite a different design in mind for what the new iMac will look like compared to the pictures that I posted.
- Not At All - The answer means that you think the iMac will look almost nothing like the model in my pictures that I posted.

Here is my design intent:
- I made a model of a touch screen iMac.
- I sloped the iMac at the angle of a common keyboard and left room for a keyboard to be placed in front of it. This angle makes it easier on the neck than looking at a piece of paper on a flat desk or table and also makes it easy for drawing with a stylus (and yes a stylus would be optional since Apple has perfected and patented fingered touch screen accuracy with their iPhone)--a lot of drawing boards are also angled up which makes the angled iMac a great all around design. The main reason for not having the screen vertical is because it would be hard on the arms and making it angled would be a lot easier for using it for many hours.
- I made the dimensions of the screen similar to (but not quite perfectly to scale) what a standard monitor's physical screen size would be.
- I filleted the edges so that they would be rounded for comfortable usage and so that the corners wouldn't be potential cutting hazards if they were to be accidentally cut into.
- (I may post another design model with the keyboard built-in to the front of the computer. That design might look better and function better anyway. The only reason that I left it off is because I thought the keyboard might get in the way but since I am now thinking about it again--the keyboard built-in will probably be better because the keyboard is needed so often and an on-screen keyboard would only get in the way (i.e. it would take up screen space) of other things that could be on the screen--and plus an onscreen keyboard is a lot harder to use. Apple has been gradually integrating an all-in-one iMac design and adding the keyboard to that all-in-one integration would be a good move for Apple. That design would make the computer all the more mobile. The only thing missing from the integration would be the mouse (and the power source ;) ).)

I made these models in the 3D rendering program named SolidWorks.

And of course feel free to post your own pictures and comments regarding what you think the new iMac will look like. :)

(This current thread is a continuation of this other thread.)
 

Attachments

  • 1 Isometric 1.png
    1 Isometric 1.png
    25.5 KB · Views: 2,117
  • 2 Right.png
    2 Right.png
    11.3 KB · Views: 2,088
  • 3 Left.png
    3 Left.png
    11.1 KB · Views: 2,085
  • 4 Front.png
    4 Front.png
    6.4 KB · Views: 2,093
  • 5 Back.png
    5 Back.png
    6.2 KB · Views: 2,087

mad jew

Moderator emeritus
Apr 3, 2004
32,191
9
Adelaide, Australia
I agree that it's probably not the direction Apple will take with the next iMac. It's an interesting design from the ergonomic tablet perspective though.
 

bartelby

macrumors Core
Jun 16, 2004
19,795
34
Not at all... not in a billion years... when spoken, truth rules out opinion.

What she said!

I agree that it's probably not the direction Apple will take with the next iMac. It's an interesting design from the ergonomic tablet perspective though.

It looks like some 1970s piece of electronic lab equipment. If the iMac was to go to a tablet format I think it look like a thicker Cintiq.
 

mpw

Guest
Jun 18, 2004
6,363
1
Not a chance. I'm not saying it wouldn't be a good design for some users, say EPOS, but it's not gonna happen for the general public. If Apple say the tablet market is too small and specialist, then this is even smaller.

How many iMac are bought by people to use in the bedroom to double as a DVD player?
How much desktop space would that take up?

EDIT: On 2nd viewing I'm wondering whether this is actually an April fools by GodBless and he's just recycled a design for a lectern he had knocking about.
 

72930

Retired
May 16, 2006
9,060
4
That looks too awkward....IF apple were to make the next iMac touchscreen, it will NOT look like that...
 

GodBless

macrumors 65816
Original poster
Jan 22, 2005
1,004
0
More Pictures...

Top Side:
attachment.php


Bottom Side:
attachment.php


Isometric View 2:
attachment.php


Other View:
attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • 6 Top.png
    6 Top.png
    13.5 KB · Views: 2,031
  • 7 Bottom.png
    7 Bottom.png
    6.5 KB · Views: 2,044
  • 8 Isometric 2.png
    8 Isometric 2.png
    16.8 KB · Views: 2,041
  • 9 Other.png
    9 Other.png
    11 KB · Views: 2,031

bartelby

macrumors Core
Jun 16, 2004
19,795
34
The additional images adds nothing. I think we all could have visualised the different views:rolleyes:

Can you imagine the footprint of a 24"? No fracking™ way.

This is an April Fool thing, isn't it? :rolleyes:

And not a very good one.
The AppleTVTivo got me for a sec though.
 

GodBless

macrumors 65816
Original poster
Jan 22, 2005
1,004
0
Wow--harsh criticism! Well--back to the drawing board (but since I don't have access to SolidWorks again for a while, I might not post my refined designs for a while). Perhaps the small fillets make the design look bad (I'll experiment with their sizes when I get a chance to later). :confused: And also remember all of the elements (including the screen, ports and logo) and an un-pixelated version of the 3D rendered model aren't included with the images that I attached. I don't think the images produced by this program can look as good as what Apple's marketing team could come up with instead for the exact same design--with that said I'd like a little feedback on what specifically I could change on the design that I posted in order for it to both look better and serve its same function.

Sure it looks like a wooden wedge but I think Apple could make it look cool--maybe giving it a shiny leather/brownish look.

I personally don't think my design is that bad but if you think that you have a better design I'd like to see pictures of iMac models posted from you guys and gals. ;)
 

GodBless

macrumors 65816
Original poster
Jan 22, 2005
1,004
0
I updated the images by removing the lines (which in my opinion makes the models look much better) with the Mac OS X Application eDrawings Viewer 2007. I hope you at least somewhat like the difference. :)

I can see the newspaper headlines--"iMac from Lamp to Wedge".
 

Scarlet Fever

macrumors 68040
Jul 22, 2005
3,262
0
Bookshop!
i'm going to be open-minded here. How does this new design make using the computer better/easier/more effective than the current design?
 

GodBless

macrumors 65816
Original poster
Jan 22, 2005
1,004
0
i'm going to be open-minded here. How does this new design make using the computer better/easier/more effective than the current design?
Well this was discussed in this thread but if you don't want to read the whole thing I've re-posted my basic thoughts about why it might happen (that I mentioned in my first post of the other thread) here:

Reasons That Support It Happening:
- What Else Would The iMac's Innovations Be?
- Leopard Still Needs It's Top Secret Features--Touch Screen Software Could Be Part Of Those Confidential Secrets That Apple Has Done A Great Job Hiding
- A Resolution Independent UI Makes Touch Screen Programming No Different Than Standard Mac OS Programming It Is Already
- Many Tablet Ideas Have Been Patented By Apple
- Jeff Han Has Been Talked About a Lot On MacRumors--Especially In Rumor Articles (like this one)
- Mac OS X Is Ready For Touch Screen Technologies

Reasons Why It Might Not Happen:
- No Information Regarding A New Revolutionary iMac Has Been Leaked From Apple Until Now So It Might Not Be As Major As One Might Think

Besides this and most importantly Apple has been developing multi-touch technologies (where you use more than one finger on the screen at a time) with their iPhone. Here are some awesome videos (click here for video 1, click here for video 2 and click here for video 3) of what multi-touch can do on large monitors.

I also think a touch screen computer would be great for various things that a keyboard and mouse can't do as fast or as well. Think about actually touching multiple buttons on the screen quickly instead of moving the mouse from one button to another button. A mouse takes a lot longer to go from one end of the screen to the next in comparison to fingers. The way I look at it is that mice can be used for precision and fingers can be used for things that don't need to be as precise. The reason why touch screen is a great technology is because it has advantages where the keyboard and the mouse don't. This doesn't mean that the mouse and keyboard will disappear (because both the keyboard and the mouse can do things better than a touch-screen input can) but it does mean that we'll have an extra way of inputing things on to our computers. We won't even required to use the touch screen if we don't want to but it will be there in case we choose to--it's just like the fact that we aren't even required to use a mouse on our computer today but we choose to use it anyway.
 

Fantomas

macrumors newbie
Mar 26, 2007
23
0
De gustibus non disputandum est

Very useful if u can fit it under the door as a doorwedge


:D
 

Jo-Kun

macrumors 6502a
Dec 20, 2003
677
0
Antwerp-Belgium
if you want to try anything on april fools at least make more of an effort than just rendering a grey piece of 'cheese' it looks like somthing to stop doors from opening, really makes no sense at all... seen better hoaxes on this forum before ;-)
 

GodBless

macrumors 65816
Original poster
Jan 22, 2005
1,004
0
Yes, but how did you get from there to a wedge of cheddar? :confused:
All I did was angle the computer to the same slope as a keyboard and then I cut off a chunk for the keyboard to fit there.

Why are people complaining and saying it's a bad design?

Is it because it looks bad?
Is it because it's April fools day?
Is it because it is designed poorly?
Is it because people don't like touch screen?

Perhaps it's a combination of all of these things. :(

Well at least you guys and gals gave me a reason to update my design. If I have time I will do it and post it.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.