SF was really weird in the beginning, but I've gotten used to it.
Helv is a better font in general but SF looks better on the UI.
San Francisco is definitely better. Helvetica Neue was always just a bad interims solution for the iOS 7 redesign.
Although, as a typographer who worked close to industrial designers at university, i wasn’t really surprised Jony Ives Team chose Helvetica, because most Industrial Designers know only a handful of fonts and default to Helvetica because it looks reasonably timeless and neutral to them. It’s really reassuring about Apples design team that they took the multiyear-path of developing their own modern font-family fit for the purpose. I think Erik Spiekermann really did have a little influence on Jony Ive to get SF ready and into the system so soon. Besides the fact that it would have been really hard to get Helvetica Neue working on the Apple watch at small, glanceable font sizes.
Exactly. Good fonts have lots of different cuts (not sure if this is the correct english translation) for different purposes. Apple did a very good job with the different sizes of SF, instead of just scaling the glyphs.Even SF Compact (Watch) and SF (OS X/iOS) are noticeably different. When you change Helvetica that much so that it works well on smaller screens, you are changing the character of the typeface itself. Helvetica was never meant to be a multipurpose UI typeface. It’s been misused, just like Verdana is (which really shines at small sizes).
Certainly not the only reason.Helvetica, however I understand why SF is getting more votes. It's the novelty atm so people aren't tired of it.
Curious as to opinions on San Francisco.
I was obsessed with it for a while.
But I thought Helvetica Neue is a lot more stylish, simple, efficient, and less obstrusive after a while.
What do you guys think?
I don't like how "blocky" SF looks compared to Helvetica. It doesn't look horrible but they could have made some subtle changes to make it look more distinct from Roboto