Apple appears to be it's own worst enemy it seems... Back when smartphones first started coming out the performance jump from one gen to the next was pretty huge, 2 to even 3X performance gains. This was similar in the PC/MAC world before the core I5/7's came out. Now we're seeing very small gains, something like 15-25%, or even less. Tack on a high price tag and support for 5 years and people are starting to wise up. If Apple is going to support my device for 5 years and all I need is a battery replacement during half-life that costs less than a hundred bucks, why pay another 800 to a grand? McDonnell Douglas did this in the past. They made indestructible planes that could fly 30-40 years. Problem was after airlines bought them, they didn't need to buy more for a long time, to replace the ones they already had. Poof, sales drop. The solution Apple really needs is to cut long term support to about 3 years and drop the models down 150-200 bucks across the board to stabilize sales. If they cut support to three years, those who would initially buy a battery replacement would be more inclined to upgrade to a new phone.
Apple appears to be it's own worst enemy it seems... Back when smartphones first started coming out the performance jump from one gen to the next was pretty huge, 2 to even 3X performance gains. This was similar in the PC/MAC world before the core I5/7's came out. Now we're seeing very small gains, something like 15-25%, or even less. Tack on a high price tag and support for 5 years and people are starting to wise up. If Apple is going to support my device for 5 years and all I need is a battery replacement during half-life that costs less than a hundred bucks, why pay another 800 to a grand? McDonnell Douglas did this in the past. They made indestructible planes that could fly 30-40 years. Problem was after airlines bought them, they didn't need to buy more for a long time, to replace the ones they already had. Poof, sales drop. The solution Apple really needs is to cut long term support to about 3 years and drop the models down 150-200 bucks across the board to stabilize sales. If they cut support to three years, those who would initially buy a battery replacement would be more inclined to upgrade to a new phone.
Now I don’t know the solution
Meaning their current business model is unsustainable. Five years of support is too long in the smartphone business. You're loosing so many potential upgrade customers when you support a product for half a decade. Apple needs to shorten it's long term support, while reducing initial purchase costs on it's products. The market is too saturated and competitive with cheap phones not to make that move.
Apple is in a mess and has been for some while under Cook. If you focus on and place revenue/profit over everything else this is where you end up. Add an enormous dose of hubris and a misplaced belief that by making things thinner you are innovating you can see the results. In the short term you make loads of money which seems to be all that he wants to do.
Cook needs to go, as does much of the management/design team. Just because you can doesn’t mean you should and just doing something isn’t a good plan when you should be doing the right thing. I managed to ditch pcs for personal use more than 15 years ago and for business 8 years ago. I’ve been a strong Apple supporter throughout that time but I am struggling to see why I would go on much longer down this route.
My Mac Pro needs replacing, but there’s nothing to replace it with from Apple and if it ever arrives it will be over priced. I’ll not replace my MacBook Pro with another one as I don’t want a lighter more flexible cased laptop that I can’t add ram to nor change the SSD. I won’t pay Apple’ss extortionate over pricing for extra of either items either.
We don’t need a new OS each year, especially one that doesn’t innovate yet one that locks out older hardware. As for Apple’s pricing, it’s bordering on ridiculous. You can’t sustain a high premium brand pricing structure AND hit the mass market with the same product. Something has to give and in my opinion Apple is now at this point. There are some big choices to make and I don’t see Cook as being capable of making the right ones.
It’s unsustainable as things are. The law of diminishing returns has well and truly kicked in. Can’t see me ever changing my iPad Pro 10.5 nor Air 2 for a new model as I can’t see what I need that I can’t already do. I won’t be buying a new iPhone to replace my 8 as I don’t need it do do anything more, I don’t want it lighter, thinner nor do I want it to be more expense. I’d love better battery life but that won’t happen.
All rather sad really.
So about your iOS devices, with iPhone being Apple’s main source of income, is the problem that new device don’t offer enough new features, or is it actually that the older devices hold up great over time because hardware and software support are great?
Sure, back in the day of the iPhone 4 there were big advancements to be made with a new generation. But as most have pointed out by now, the market is saturated and tech is now quite advanced overall. I can’t name a big leap that I would need for iPhone right now, like you said, iPhone 8 was already quite great. (BTW, better iPhone battery life can be found in XR)
So then for Apple, the problem would be that devices hold up too great over time like @darksithpro pointed out. I personally don’t think that’s a problem, I think it’s great. Apple might be raising pricing because people are upgrading less often. An iPhone may be worth more to customers if they last longer.
Apple appears to be it's own worst enemy it seems... Back when smartphones first started coming out the performance jump from one gen to the next was pretty huge, 2 to even 3X performance gains. This was similar in the PC/MAC world before the core I5/7's came out. Now we're seeing very small gains, something like 15-25%, or even less. Tack on a high price tag and support for 5 years and people are starting to wise up. If Apple is going to support my device for 5 years and all I need is a battery replacement during half-life that costs less than a hundred bucks, why pay another 800 to a grand? McDonnell Douglas did this in the past. They made indestructible planes that could fly 30-40 years. Problem was after airlines bought them, they didn't need to buy more for a long time, to replace the ones they already had. Poof, sales drop. The solution Apple really needs is to cut long term support to about 3 years and drop the models down 150-200 bucks across the board to stabilize sales. If they cut support to three years, those who would initially buy a battery replacement would be more inclined to upgrade to a new phone.