Post your Cinebench R15 score

[SmOgER]

Initial R23 results show M1 mobile chip to be faster than my desktop running X58 platform X5650@4Ghz 2200Mhz DDR3 TC. I find this a bit hard to believe hence I would appreciate if anyone could post Cinebench R15 multi-core score as I'm much more familiar with those numbers.

R15 can be downloaded from here (mega mirror): https://mega.nz/file/8uRXTAxC#R89uGfDL4Of7ynozrAZL6TLKKuVoQEAjGAb6uxPN5Ds

PS. X5650@4Ghz scores between 900 and 1000.

 

[leman]

R15 does not have native support for Apple Silicon, so the M1 would be at a severe disadvantage there.

There is nothing surprising with M1 outperforming an X5650. A single M1 performance core running at 3Ghz is basically as fast as an Intel Skylake core running at 5 Ghz. A Westmere, even overclocked, doesn't stand a chance. Not to mention that the RAM in the M1 Macs is about twice as fast as your triple-channel DDR3

 

[nameste]

Initial R23 results show M1 mobile chip to be faster than my desktop running X58 platform X5650@4Ghz 2200Mhz DDR3 TC. I find this a bit hard to believe hence I would appreciate if anyone could post Cinebench R15 multi-core score as I'm much more familiar with those numbers.

R15 can be downloaded from here (mega mirror): https://mega.nz/file/8uRXTAxC#R89uGfDL4Of7ynozrAZL6TLKKuVoQEAjGAb6uxPN5Ds

PS. X5650@4Ghz scores between 900 and 1000.

Sorry mate but after m1 chip ,Intel is old news

 

[SmOgER]

Not to mention that the RAM in the M1 Macs is about twice as fast as your triple-channel DDR3

I very much doubt that. I run DDR3 TC @ 2200Mhz at 10-10-10-26 1T. In other words frequency of DDR4 with much tighter timings.

 

[SmOgER]

Sorry mate but after m1 chip ,Intel is old news

Well not gonna lie it does look like it so far lol.

 

[leman]

I very much doubt that. I run DDR3 TC @ 2200Mhz at 10-10-10-26 1T. In other words frequency of DDR4 with much tighter timings.

You probably mean 2200MT/s? I don't think there is any DDR3 in existence that can run at 2200Mhz...

Anyway, M1's quad channel memory runs at 4267MT/s (with 32-bit channels). That's about 68.2GB/s total bandwidth.

 

[acidfast7_redux]

I very much doubt that. I run DDR3 TC @ 2200Mhz at 10-10-10-26 1T. In other words frequency of DDR4 with much tighter timings.

Wow. People still talk about memory timings. 2005 called and wants it's coolness back.

Anyone not on UMA is already behind, significantly.

 

[SmOgER]

Wow. People still talk about memory timings. 2005 called and wants it's coolness back.

Anyone not on UMA is already behind, significantly.

Well I do realise older memory controllers can't quite get the same bandwidth, but I have some doubts regarding that SODIMM being "twice as fast".

EDIT: Alright. I think this chip really caught me by surprise. Memory read and copy DO look impressive. Wow.

The 2020 Mac Mini Unleashed: Putting Apple Silicon M1 To The Test

www.anandtech.com

 

[leman]

Well I do realise older memory controllers can't quite get the same bandwidth, but I have some doubts regarding that SODIMM being "twice as fast".

It's not SODIMM, it's on-package LPDDR4X Mobile memory has come a long way! Current LPDDR4 is faster than desktop DDR4 if configured properly (but much more expensive).

 

[SmOgER]

It's not SODIMM, it's on-package LPDDR4X

Yep, realised that after reading that anandtech article.

 

[nameste]

Well not gonna lie it does look like it so far lol.

I also have 5960x desktop I wonder if m1 beats it

 

[leman]

I also have 5960x desktop I wonder if m1 beats it

From the CPU specs, my guess would be that M1 is much better in single-core and somewhat better in multi-core.

 

[SmOgER]

I also have 5960x desktop I wonder if m1 beats it

Looking at the geekbench, M1 beats it in single core tasks and 5960x is slightly better in multicore (versus Rosetta2 but not M1).

ST: 933 vs 1327
MT: 7248 vs 7715 M1 / 6069 M1 Rosetta2