It has better hardware compatibility with PowerPC machines than Linux does overall. The only thing holding it back is a good web browser. Otter browser is okay, but it’s far too sluggish, and lacks the ability to install addons. I tried to build Arctic Fox for OpenBSD yesterday, but it fails during the configuration stage.Post screenshots of OpenBSD in use! Web browsing, general usage, system specs, light photo/video editing and whatever you normally use this OS for.
Is it better than Linux?
I thought Netsurf was modern, light, and standards-compliant?It has better hardware compatibility with PowerPC machines than Linux does overall. The only thing holding it back is a good web browser. Otter browser is okay, but it’s far too sluggish, and lacks the ability to install addons. I tried to build Arctic Fox for OpenBSD yesterday, but it fails during the configuration stage.
Depends on what standards you expect it to comply with lol. Don't expect to use any websites that require JS for interaction. Even Macrumors would be unusable, especially after the "upgrade" they did to the site recently.I thought Netsurf was modern, light, and standards-compliant?
That update just slowed down the site even more. It even broke the mobile version of the site for a couple days. Does Reddit, gmail, discord, and youtube work?Depends on what standards you expect it to comply with lol. Don't expect to use any websites that require JS for interaction. Even Macrumors would be unusable, especially after the "upgrade" they did to the site recently.
Reddit in the old format should work, Gmail HTML format should work, Discord and Youtube are no-go's.That update just slowed down the site even more. It even broke the mobile version of the site for a couple days. Does Reddit, gmail, discord, and youtube work?
So no messaging sites work? or any video/audio streaming? Is this all thanks to lack of JS support?Reddit in the old format should work, Gmail HTML format should work, Discord and Youtube are no-go's.
That, among other things as well (HTML5, WebRTC, etc..). I believe it technically "supports" JS, but has a very rudimentary implementation.So no messaging sites work? or any video/audio streaming? Is this all thanks to lack of JS support?
A question about Arctic Fox, it appears to look like the old old Firefox design, (versions 28 and lower)That, among other things as well (HTML5, WebRTC, etc..). I believe it technically "supports" JS, but has a very rudimentary implementation.
I thought Netsurf was modern, light, and standards-compliant?
I built 3.9 from source on Debian a few weeks ago, and haven’t seen much difference between it, and 3.8. I appreciate what they’re doing with the project, and it’s great for general browsing / reading, but not much beyond that at the moment. The build instructions are on their website, and it doesn’t take more than 15 or 20 minutes to build on a decently clocked G4. Give it a try. I’m not trying to take anything away from Netsurf, but the web is such a bloated horrible mess, you need a bloated browser to interface with it properly. Arctic Fox is the closest thing we’re probably ever going to get to perfect. It’s fully featured, yet not bloated. I even use it on my x86 machines nowThat's another reason I'm waiting to install OBSD. The coming 6.6 release in October will come with Netsurf 3.9 (instead of 3.7), which was upped with more standards compliance, more speed, and better x support all around.
@sparty411, wait for that version before making final judgements.
SE 30s are useless I thought, 68k MacNetBSD or bust! (I'll have to dig out my SE/30 w/ 128 MB RAM PDS Ethernet, and a 9 GB hard drive with NetBSD loaded on it that acted as my home server for many years.)