Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
The biggest con is definitely paying for 3G service. If I can share my 3G data service from my iPhone with the iPad, then I will not hesitate one second on getting the 3G iPad.
 
The biggest con is definitely paying for 3G service. If I can share my 3G data service from my iPhone with the iPad, then I will not hesitate one second on getting the 3G iPad.

That would be tethering which converts your phones 3G signal to WiFi so a 3G iPad wouldn't be necessary.
 
Con: At least for me is AT&T is already getting over $100.00 per month from me. I really don't need the 3G access as I have an iPhone that goes with me where ever I go, the iPad does not.
 
I bought my girlfriend the wifi 64GB. After using it for a month, I don't see a real need for 3G. Yes it's a nice option to have, but we hardly take the iPad out of the house. If I need 3G I have my iPhone for that. Kind of wish I just went 64GB wifi from the start. Oh well, I'm not going to cancel now since I waited a month already. Next version I will seriously considering just wifi only.
 
The gps and no contract internet did it for me. I had a 64 gb wifi model, used it for 1 1/2 weeks and my dad took it off my hands. The 3g will be for whatever may change in the future, I don't know if i'm going to change my lifestyle or job where I may need 3g. Am I going to use the 3g when I get it this friday, probably not for a while.
 
Lousy streaming over 3G? I downloaded a 500MB video on my iPhone when I was on vacation last week and I got 300kb/s consistently on 3G. That's pretty respectable IMO. How's the DL speed on your wifi model when away from a hotspot?
 
One more thing about the AT&T data plan to consider, is the way the iPad constantly reloads webpages on Safari, I think that people will find that there is no other choice than to get the $30/month plan, and we all may be kidding ourselves thinking we could get away with $15 a month, unless it is only for checking email and other very light tasks.

For me, I can't bear to give AT&T another $30 on top of what I already pay for my iPhone. Here in NYC, to maintain my call integrity and not kill my phone battery, my 3G has been disabled for months and months now! I have wi-fi at home and at work, and when I'm out an about, the dreaded EDGE network delivers my email to me just fine, and I typically forego any web surfing unless I find an open wi-fi network somewhere!

If I used an iPad even remotely the same as my iPhone there is NO WAY I would even remotely come close 250Mb a month. Currently I pull in about 3GB a month. I would strongly suggest checking your data usage before signing up for a data plan.

That being said, the MyFi option is giving me some thoughts that maybe I don't need another 3G bill. :)
 
For me it all came down to the "on the go" factor. I could have went with a wifi iPad, but I thought about the people I know that have an iPod Touch instead of an iPhone. Sure, wifi is available a lot of places, but there are tons of times I can use a 3G connection. In the car, somewhere they charge for wifi, power outage or internet outage at my house, and plenty of other places. On top of that there are a lot of apps that use an internet connection. If you are away from wifi, you are screwed out of these apps. I know people that have messaging apps like Ping on their iPod Touches and I constantly have reply issues with them because they are away from wifi and can't send or receive messages for hours or more. To me the $130 extra is worth the added connectivity and convenience.

Also, the fact that it is a non-contract 3G plan meaning I can cancel if I don't need it and restart when I do, makes it even better.
 
For me it all came down to the "on the go" factor. I could have went with a wifi iPad, but I thought about the people I know that have an iPod Touch instead of an iPhone. Sure, wifi is available a lot of places, but there are tons of times I can use a 3G connection. In the car, somewhere they charge for wifi, power outage or internet outage at my house, and plenty of other places. On top of that there are a lot of apps that use an internet connection. If you are away from wifi, you are screwed out of these apps. I know people that have messaging apps like Ping on their iPod Touches and I constantly have reply issues with them because they are away from wifi and can't send or receive messages for hours or more. To me the $130 extra is worth the added connectivity and convenience.

Also, the fact that it is a non-contract 3G plan meaning I can cancel if I don't need it and restart when I do, makes it even better.

Good point. I mainly will use it at home and probably not take it out of the house. Heck I don't even take my laptop out of my house. Maybe only a handful of times in the 3 plus years I've owned it. I guess I was going for 3G because it was top of the line. But I'm not one to be taking every device with me where I go. I only take my iPhone with me and I'm good to go. Ugh.. tough decision on if I should keep the 3G or get wifi only. :confused:
 
If you are confident you won't use the 3g aspect, and if gps isn't crucial to you, of course you should get wifi only.

I know for sure that with my use pattern, 3g makes sense. I could tether my Nexus One, I've done that from time to time with a laptop, but then you're limited by the phone's battery. The iPad's battery life is a huge plus to me - maybe the device's #1 feature.
 
I'm not sure what benefit 3G will be except to be a $130 insurance policy. Of course, unlike insurance, if you use it, you have to pay out $15 or $30/mo.

Hehe, all I could think when I read this was "Deductible". :D



Also the part cost $7, but there was also extra engineering expenses, testing expenses, and its unknown if Apple is actually paying ATT a subsidy to get the $30/unlimited/no contract deal. They sure don't offer that pricing to any other device.

I don't know, but I'd wager it's the opposite. Apple is far more likely to be getting a kickback from AT&T than paying a subsidy. Exclusivity is a pretty big deal. Remember that Verizon passed on the iPhone. AT&T definitely kicked back airtime income to Apple when the first iPhone launched. I would be surprised if that weren't the same with this.


As far as the OP, for me, dropping $700 on an iPad made the extra $130 to be able to use it pretty much anywhere a no-brainer. I don't HAVE to pay a 3G plan, but if I want it, it's there.


Someone mentioned not being able to use 3G or wifi during a flight. True, but for the 4 hours you're stuck on the tarmac, you're going to be glad you have the 3G iPad. :D


B
 
If you are confident you won't use the 3g aspect, and if gps isn't crucial to you, of course you should get wifi only.

I know for sure that with my use pattern, 3g makes sense. I could tether my Nexus One, I've done that from time to time with a laptop, but then you're limited by the phone's battery. The iPad's battery life is a huge plus to me - maybe the device's #1 feature.

GPS I only use google maps when I am out and about. I've never owned a 3G data card for my laptop and I don't see a need for me to carry an iPad around where I go. My iPhone takes care of those tasks for me. I'm at work all day in front of a computer so having 3G internet with me isn't a issue. I guess I am painting myself in a corner to go with wifi only.
 
If I remember correctly, one of the reasons for the $130 3G price tag is the licensing of the 3G technology. I maybe wrong, but I believe it factors in a good amount.
 
For the choice was where I go. I have wifi at home and it reaches my yard, school, any local coffee shop in the area so I don't absolutely need 3G. If there is something that important I can reach into my pocket. For two weeks I haven't caught myself wishing I could use it outside a wifi area.
 
I view the 3G as "connection insurance" -- If I've don't have WiFi but I have to have connectivity, then I can buy service for the month. If I don't need it, I don't have to buy it.

+1.

And personally, I'd prefer to not have to spend time and angst rigging up a solution, in the event of no wi-fi. For me, it's a matter of convenience. My plan is to use the iPad as a mobile device, at least a fair amount of the time. For that reason, it'll be good to have the 3G and not be at the mercy of wi-fi availability.
 
I don't know, but I'd wager it's the opposite. Apple is far more likely to be getting a kickback from AT&T than paying a subsidy. Exclusivity is a pretty big deal. Remember that Verizon passed on the iPhone. AT&T definitely kicked back airtime income to Apple when the first iPhone launched. I would be surprised if that weren't the same with this.

Except it's not an exclusive deal like the iPhone. The iPad is unlocked and no-contract. That benefits Apple more than ATT. ATT surely would not be making any $ on a no-contract $30 plan if it had to push $ back to Apple.
 
True. But you'd have to admit it does take away from its sexiness since you can also see it on the top when viewing the screen. In a case... not an issue which is what I plan on doing as well anyway.

Haven't seen it in person yet but I kinda like the black bar! Chalk it up cognitive dissonance or whatever you may but it looks cool to me..
 
So I am actually pretty happy with my wifi ipad, but I can help but think it would be nice to have the benefits of 3g. At the same time I am wondering if it is really worth the 10% restocking fee I will incur, the extra $130 on top of that, and than the added cost of 3g. So I thought Id compile a list of pros and cons of the 3g ipad hoping that people can add to it.

Pros of 3g ipad

wireless connection when you need it
GPS chip
More versatile apps that would be able to take advantage of the GPS


Cons of 3g ipad

More of an expense
Ugly black bar across the back
lousy streaming video over 3g


Thats all I can come up with for now...Can anyone think of anything else?

You will never find yourself "regretting" getting the 3G version. I returned my wifi version after I found myself wanting to take it everywhere. When you don't have access to wifi (which will be more often than most people are willing to admit).....it feels like a crippled device. For many people, the wifi is a smarter choice because they will most likely never leave the house with it. But if you are on macrumors.....I think we know that is not your case.
 
I think it's going to depend on a case by case matter. I live in southern California where nearly ALL places I would actually take my iPad have wifi. If I really needed 3G I can tether as others have mentioned so I feel the extra price for the 3G model itself and having to pay $30 dollars a month which in a year comes out to $360 isn't worth it at all. Others may or may not feel the same, but this is my situation. And have fun on AT&T, I can hardly stand the coverage they "offer".
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.