Ok guys.
I've got my next purchase whittled down to two different machines (Have them in line)
Wondering what specific significant differences there are between these two machines, or if one has a better/easier/cheaper upgrade path than the other, in order to determine if the 2010 justifies the higher price tag
2009 Quad 2.66
2010 Quad 2.8
If it matters one way or the other... at some point I intend to swap the processor board and convert to Dual CPU's (To 8 or 12).... SOMEDAY
Is there really any major benefit to the 2010 ??? Aside from being a little newer, literally?
Like, can a 2009 take a Westmere upgrade?
I seem to remember reading something about the processor swap being easier on one?
Maybe some links to existing threads? Having a hard time finding specifics, or direct comparisons...
Things like this...
The 2010 is going to run me around $400 more than the 2009, as a point of reference
I've got my next purchase whittled down to two different machines (Have them in line)
Wondering what specific significant differences there are between these two machines, or if one has a better/easier/cheaper upgrade path than the other, in order to determine if the 2010 justifies the higher price tag
2009 Quad 2.66
2010 Quad 2.8
If it matters one way or the other... at some point I intend to swap the processor board and convert to Dual CPU's (To 8 or 12).... SOMEDAY
Is there really any major benefit to the 2010 ??? Aside from being a little newer, literally?
Like, can a 2009 take a Westmere upgrade?
I seem to remember reading something about the processor swap being easier on one?
Maybe some links to existing threads? Having a hard time finding specifics, or direct comparisons...
Things like this...
The 2010 is going to run me around $400 more than the 2009, as a point of reference
Last edited: