Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Dal123

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Oct 23, 2008
903
0
England
I'm having problems with Quark, when I print the resolution on my vector artwork is poor. I'm also having grief laying it out, on the reverse side of the business card they scatter on the print out just a couple of mm off but obviously completely ruins the cards and they are useless.

I think that Quark is over-rated, it's suppose to be the top-notch layout software, but Illustrator has a better alignment tool. Maybe I'll go for it on Illustrator :confused:.
 
I can't speak to the advantages of Quark, since I don't use it. But I use Illustrator for business cards all the time, and it works fine. I also use Illustrator as my layout tool for advertisements, banners, and generally anything that doesn't require multiple pages.

It's no doubt a simplification to say this, but my philosophy is that InDesign and Quark are the tool of choice on projects:
  • that require multiple pages
  • that are text heavy

I know a lot of people use Quark and InDesign for simpler, one-page projects, and there's nothing wrong with that, but Illustrator is a fine tool for such things as well. It all comes down to personal preference.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.