Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Grumply

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Feb 24, 2017
285
194
Melbourne, Australia
Hi guys,

Haven't been able to find much info on this. I have a software license for SoftRAID, and like the monitoring tools it provides. But I'm wondering if anyone can speak to general performance or reliability between 4-drive RAID 10 arrays in the Mac Pro 5,1 using the internal Disk Utility and Softraid?

Are there any significant differences or benefits between the two?

This would be for a Media Storage drive, the OS will sit on an SSD in the Optical Bay.

Cheers
 
Here's OWC's new 2 TB Accelsior 4M2 card.... speed may be down since I moved the failing iTunes drive to it after SoftRAID spotted it as failing. However I am getting only half speed as expected on PCIe 2 16x. I am looking forward to testing it as scratch once my new 2tb data ssd arrives. I have a thunderbolt raid on my mini and preferred disk utility to SoftRaid there but I don't remember why.
I can't see the point of storing my media on the card long term, it will stay on a crucial BX500. I'll only use this for faster transfer and at some point will move my OS to a single card leaving the other three for raid.
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2020-01-26 at 10.27.50 AM.png
    Screen Shot 2020-01-26 at 10.27.50 AM.png
    2.3 MB · Views: 284
Last edited:
Hi guys,

Haven't been able to find much info on this. I have a software license for SoftRAID, and like the monitoring tools it provides. But I'm wondering if anyone can speak to general performance or reliability between 4-drive RAID 10 arrays in the Mac Pro 5,1 using the internal Disk Utility and Softraid?

If this is a 4 drive HDD array than SoftRAID's drive health monitoring is more than substantially better than the "Disk Utility" solution. That isn't a 'performance' difference but it is a functionality difference.

SoftRAID's predicative powers on SSD's is as big of a differential. They fail in different ways that SoftRAID's heuristics don't have deep insight on at this point.
 
I have used Softraid for drives in two Thunderbay enclosures in a Raid 10 configuration for over 5 years. They have worked perfectly. Even though I had 2 drives fail during that period, no data was lost and the failed drives were easily replaced.
 
Can disk utility do RAID 5?
4 drive RAID 5 isnt really too valuable but no disk utility wont do it.
I’d say RAID10 is the safest way to be fast with large HDDs when you have 4 large drives.
That being said its also kind of painful getting disk utility to do raid 10, and to replace a failed drive you have to use the command line to do it (I’ve done it using apples software raid 10)
 
  • Like
Reactions: kittiyut
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.