I bet the computer isn't all that wonderful. Specs aside, it looks like they tried to make a cheap macbook pro and cut the thickness down 0.07 inches to brag. The graphics card is about on par with the 6750m in 15 & 17" macbook pros and the processor is inferior, as far as I can tell. 8gb of memory is thrown in there to make the price a bit less mind-boggling, the 1980x1080 (2,073,600 pixels) screen doesn't seem as clear and or as nice as the glossy 1900x1200 (2,280,000 pixels) 17" screen. Both of them have a fine Webcam... ...The keys are green and backlit! GREEN. Cool, I'd like color customization on my macbook pro, but that's nothing important. If it was confined to one color, I'd pick white/blue like Apple did anyways. I bet the trackpad is nowhere near as responsive than the macbook pro'ss (although it's gaming functions do look sorta neat, though I'd never use them)... ...Uh, not to mention it's a Windows computer. Overall, for $4-700 dollars more than a macbook pro, I think it's really nothing special.
----------
I'm skeptical about the battery life... It's also plastic... Grease will accumulate quicker and I bet more heat will be kept inside the computer, rather than dissipated through a metal exterior. I feel like the Macbook Pro can look at this computer and say, "Im' a terminator" with that accent. It also has half the hard drive capacity of a Macbook Pro. When Razer tried to make a computer that was thinner than Apple's, they couldn't come up with the craft and the internals... ...It's flashy, but it's plastic, expensive, and doesn't live up to what it's competing with. You can tell that it's trying to compete with Apple because all the sites I've seen it advertised on constantly compare it to the Macbook Pro laptop. I generally don't get involved with the Windows vs OSX or Mac vs PC argument, however I dislike it when reviewers find a higher number model or a different clock speed then start sneering in their reviews.
