Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Buck987

macrumors 65816
Original poster
Jan 16, 2010
1,268
2,106
I am thinking in investing in a tripod to use to capture wildlife and landscapes. However there seems to be so may choices and price ranges. (Some Carbon fibers ones can sure get expensive!)

Would appreciate hearing recommendations from the group here. Comments on weight, durability and value would be most welcomed.

I did a search but nothing recent turned up.

thanks
Buck
 
I love my old aluminum Gitzo traveller, however I see these have all migrated up into the stratospheric price range since my purchase 50+ years ago. Mine was not that expensive but it is headless as I used it with my 4x5 camera which of course has a rotating back. I also have a rather heavy Slik from the same era, solid as a rock and about as heavy. Both are overkill for the lightweight travel cameras the wife and I now use. For those we go with a lightweight Slik, again about 50 years old.

More often we don't bother as both of us can hand hold down to about 1/15th of a second at wide angle, but more like 1/30th at longer lens lengths. You will be surprised how often nature or man provides a good platform for your camera. Fence posts are an obvious one, or small rocks when you need to be close to the ground.

Depending on the camera, a small flat platform on the top of a walking stick can provide a great surface as well.
 
Last edited:
I am thinking in investing in a tripod to use to capture wildlife and landscapes. However there seems to be so may choices and price ranges. (Some Carbon fibers ones can sure get expensive!)

Would appreciate hearing recommendations from the group here. Comments on weight, durability and value would be most welcomed.

I did a search but nothing recent turned up.

thanks
Buck
What is your need? Will you be carrying it to remote places - if so carbon fibre for weight reduction is definitely a plus. I have and can recommend the Peak Design Travel Tripod. It should last me many years.
 
Landscape, starry night, moon, pano, etc photography use a sturdy tripod..(from Alu to Carbon Fibre, your $$ choice)
Be sure you try to stick with one brand because you don't want to deal with different types of quick shoes.
Wildlife and nature photography I use a sturdy but lightweight Oben monopod with a Oben VH-A30 tilt head. The latter only goes up and down and the rotation is created by turning the monopod..
Lots of reviews and info in YouTube..
 
  • Like
Reactions: Buck987
Tripods and heads are a whole subject in and of themselves, and good ones are expensive!

Basically the old saying on this is pick two of the three-stiffness, light weight, and inexpensive.

Typically the legs and head are purchased separately, and you pick each to suit you best.

Gitzo is often the go-to suggestion, although there are some other great makers out there. I use a lower end Manfrotto CF tripod that I've been happy with, although Manfrotto draws some mixed opinions on quality.

When you're buying legs, here's what all you need to consider:

1. Height-This is a big one as ideally it should be tall enough that you can bring your viewfinder to a comfortable height without raising the center column or at least only doing so minimally. I'm 6'2", and this is something that can really run up the price of a tripod for me, but even the best center column raised more than a couple of inches basically kills all the stiffness you paid big money for in the rest of your tripod. When shopping, bear in mind that your head+camera will add 8" at least to the height of the legs, although this is dependent on the camera and the head.

2. Folded size-Most tripods out there have either 3 or 4 leg segments. All else equal, 3 segment legs will be stiffer than 4 segment, but also longer.

3. Weight support needed-You're asking for trouble if you try to stick a 20lb view camera on a tripod rated for 10lbs, but you're paying for and carrying around a lot more than you need if you're sticking 5lbs of camera on a 20lb rated tripod.

4. Material/Stiffness/Weight-I lump all of these in together because they work together. Wood in a lot of ways is the ideal tripod material as it absorbs vibration, but it's HEAVY. Aluminum is stiff, but transmits vibration well so weight is its main defense against it. Carbon fiber is stiffer than aluminum for a given amount of material, and does have some "springiness" that will absorb vibration. I personally consider CF the all around best choice outside the studio, although I have used both aluminum wood in the studio and close to home/the car.

Heads are a totally different subject, and quality ones of any type that will allow you to move the camera when you need to but keep it still when you don't are expensive. A lot of still photographers like ball heads. A good quality ball head allows you to position the camera in virtually any position rather easily. I use an Arca-Swiss B1, which is older(no longer in production) but I'm quite happy with it. It was a reference ball head for a while, although newer ones have replaced it.

Pan tilt heads are ubiquitous on less expensive tripods. I love the one that's on my Tiltall, but there again they are all over the place. Some still photographers are moving toward gimbal or fluid heads-I plead ignorance on those.

The last piece of all of it is attaching your camera to the head. If you are going to use a QR system, I HIGHLY recommend using an Arca-Swiss style dovetail system. The Really Right Stuff(RRS) system is subtly different but I use a whole lot of RRS plates with my AS head and they all work fine. These style plates are a sort of defacto standard, are small enough that they can be left attached to a camera(especially the Kirk and RRS plates that are custom made for each camera) and are fast and easy to attach and remove. I even have a Kirk foot on my 70-200 f/2.8, which is really convenient as the foot fits directly into the plate retainer. Avoid the million different Bogen/Manfrotto QR plates.
 
Also, get the biggest, heaviest, and stiffest tripod that you will actually carry and use. Be practical, no tripod is any good if you leave it at home because it's too heavy to carry out in the field.
 
What is your need? Will you be carrying it to remote places - if so carbon fibre for weight reduction is definitely a plus. I have and can recommend the Peak Design Travel Tripod. It should last me many years.
I am doing more hiking and bird walks with my wife, and while I enjoy road cycling more, doing some of these activities with her provides opportunities to do more photo taking which I also like. So, yes the ability to walk with the tripod for at least some distance would be good.
 
Tripods and heads are a whole subject in and of themselves, and good ones are expensive!

Basically the old saying on this is pick two of the three-stiffness, light weight, and inexpensive.
Thank you for such a detailed and valuable response. Gives me lots of avenues to pursue. Much appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Years ago, a backpacker I knew carried a small mesh bag with him, which he filled with at-hand rocks and then suspended from the nexus of the tripod. This only works if you'll be in places with handy rocks (streams, mountains, deserts, etc.).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Clix Pix
Thirty-some years ago I bought both a Gitzo Reporter aluminum tripod and a similar monopod. Both are still in use although pretty heavy vs current CF options.

Just wanted to add this in agreement with other comments that a good tripod can be a life-time purchase, so buy the best you can afford. These days, definitely buy a decent carbon fiber model unless you just don't have the cash.

These days, my main tripod is a Manfrotto 190 which they don't make any longer but I think I paid around $350 for it. I also have a Manfrotto BeFree that is very light but packs in my carry-on suitcase. Both of these I have fitted with Arca-style ball heads which let me mount a lot of different devices. Manfrotto tends to have a gazillion different QR plate designs which can really be a pita.

I have not found any major problems with the Manfrotto pods, their original leg tightening levers need occasional maintenance but other than that they have done a good job for me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Buck987
What is your need? Will you be carrying it to remote places - if so carbon fibre for weight reduction is definitely a plus. I have and can recommend the Peak Design Travel Tripod. It should last me many years.
+1 for Peak Design. I have a cheapie tripod from Best Buy I’ve been using for 20 years. I borrowed a friends Peak Design tripod and didn’t want to give it back. Really high quality, light and very portable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Buck987
These days, my main tripod is a Manfrotto 190 which they don't make any longer but I think I paid around $350 for it.

That's actually my main tripod also. Mine is CF(are all 190s?) and is an older one without the "flippable" center column. I actually bought it used from a local camera shop-they had a B1 for I think $200 in their case and I centered in on it but wanted a passable set of CF legs to put it on. They had this little 190 for $125 or so, stuck the two together and I was out for under $350 including sales tax.

I bought the 190 thinking it's cheap enough as a place holder until I get a set of Gitzo CF legs to put under it, but about 4 years or so later they're still together and the thought of spending $$$ on Gitzo legs has kind gone to the back of my mind. I've hauled that tripod and head all over the country(albeit never on a plane) and it's spent plenty of time knocking around in my trunk or other places. Very rarely do I find it lacking for my purposes.

BTW, at some point during COVID lockdowns last year I ended up buying a couple of Nikon f/2.8 normal zooms as part of a discussion on Photo.net and did a bunch of sample photos comparing the old 35-70 to the newer 28-70 to the generation-old 24-70 f/2.8G. I just spent an afternoon in the back yard with my D810 on that tripod/head without much thought. I uploaded some full res files and someone complemented me on how good of a tripod I must have been using because they saw zero change in position frame-to-frame when I was showing the same lens at different apertures(same zoom setting). I think the person was expecting me to say it was either one of my massive view camera affairs(either my wooden one or the 50lb aluminum one I have) but were suitable impressed that this little cheap job was so consistent. I've also used it to take tack-sharp 30 second exposures that I've printed to 20x24.
 
I wanted a combination tripod (landscapes) and monopod (hiking) and ended up with this:


It checked off all my boxes, the most important of which was durability for the lowest price, as it would be carried everywhere, and I didn't want to invest hundreds in a system to haul around strapped to a pack in the rain. It held up great for the 1.5 years I owned it (sold it recently) and was still in really good shape and fully functional. For the price (I bought it on sale for less than the current price), I didn't find anything else close.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Buck987
Mine is CF(are all 190s?) and is an older one without the "flippable" center column
Mine is the original flip model. If I remember right, they made a 2nd version of the flip model before they quit making it or moved on to whatever has replaced it. Yes, mine is CF. I gave up the heavy DSLRs in about 2008 and have been shooting Olympus 4/3 but have been looking at Sony lately. I still have a lot of "big glass" from my Canon FD days, they adapt ok onto mirrorless bodies but I use them mostly for astrophotography these days.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Buck987
I've had great luck buying used online, you need to know the weight of your gear so you buy the right combination and look up the specs of the items before buying. My best buy, a used Gitzo ballhead that I bought for less than $40 which lives on a robust Bogan tripod that I paid about $125 for about five years ago. Then there was the Manfrotto 3021B that I got for less than $75 but I did pay retail for the ballhead which I hate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Buck987
I drive far, and hike very little (most times within 200 feet from my truck). The tripod I use is heavy, sturdy, and relatively inexpensive. One of the things I like about this tripod when taking macro or close-up of flowers that are close to the ground is that it allows for setting the center column horizontally. The legs can also be moved to nearly a horizontal level. This tripod is an older, Manfrotto 055XPROB. The head I have been using is a Manfrotto 496RC2.

My wife likes the Manfrotto 290 Light with the same head as mine. This little tripod is strong, but the center column cannot be placed horizontally. Anyway, there are several lightweight Manfrotto tripods you can buy. Just remember that while some include a head, not all do. My preference is for "ballheads" since I can turn the camera in numerous directions. You will also need a quick release plate. The Manfrotto200PL RC2-System Quick Release fits the head 496RC2 on both of our tripods.

Carbon fiber and all of that is great...if you want lightness in a tripod. For me weight is not an issue, since I what I need is a tripod that is stable (no wobbly legs for me) :)
 
Last edited:
I have a couple of Gitzo tripods that have been part of the household for a number of years....25 or 30, at least..... I don't know the model number, couldn't find it on either of them, but they are probably no longer made anyway. They're carbon fibre and they still do the job admirably. One of them is fitted with an RRS ballhead and the other is fitted with a Wimberley WH 200 Gimbal. I also have a Gitzo monopod as well, plus a recently-acquired small Oben tripod for using with tabletop photography and later in nicer weather (hopefully) shooting flowers outdoors.

I am not a big fan of using tripods but they really are necessary in some situations.....
 
Last edited:
I have a couple of Gitzo tripods that have been part of the household for a number of years....25 or 30, at least..... I don't know the model number, couldn't find it on either of them, but they are probably no longer made anyway. They're carbon fibre and they still do the job admirably. One of them is fitted with an RRS ballhead and the other is fitted with a Wimberley WH 100 Gimbal II. I also have a Gitzo monopod as well, plus a recently-acquired small Oben tripod for using with tabletop photography and later in nicer weather (hopefully) shooting flowers outdoors.

I am not a big fan of using tripods but they really are necessary in some situations.....
Question, my very old Gitzo (~50 years old) has a center column that can be easily removed and hung upside down. Great for close-ups especially if using a smaller camera.

Do the new ones still do that?
 
One unique use of a tripod in this day of smartphone cameras. The night mode in the newer iPhones is sensitive to movement. Handheld, it restricts you to a 10 second exposure which is quite amazing. However, if you mount it on a tripod where it will be essentially motionless, it will expand this to 30 seconds which can yield some amazing shots especially if you are shooting stars or other very dim scenes.
 
Question, my very old Gitzo (~50 years old) has a center column that can be easily removed and hung upside down. Great for close-ups especially if using a smaller camera.

Do the new ones still do that?

Don't know about the ones which have come out in the past, say, ten years, but the center columns in my two do. I've never used my tripods in that way, though.
 
My main tripod is a Manfrotto 055cxpro4 with a sirui K-40X ballhead on it. It is great. Not too heavy but plenty sturdy enough. I would like a Gitzo tripod but cannot say it would be any better than the Manfrotto I have. If I were looking to buy now, I would look at a KingJoy as they manufacture the tripods for a number of the big names and offer the quality at a good price. If I was to make a recommendation, I would suggest a twistlock mechanism on the legs and a simple leg positioning mechanism. The 055 has big thumb buttons to position the legs which have been a bit uncooperative in cold weather. Also I have pinched myself on the lever locks on the legs a few times which is not serious but you know when you do it.

There is a saying that holds on tripods, buy cheap buy twice. So it is worth investing in the legs in terms of not going cheap but not too expensive. Then get a head to meet your needs.

If you are going to be capturing nature in morion then a gimbal head may be an option to consider. I havent used one so cannot really comment on them but they seem to be the weapon of choice of a lot of nature photographers.

I also have some lighter options for travelling. A MeFoto Roadtrip aluminium which is good enough and light weight, can't remember the last time I used it. MeFoto DayTrip mini tripod which extends to about 2 ft high so bigger than a tabletop tripod but a lot more compact than a full height. This is great for urban areas where there are more choices of things to stand it on. With these two they are aluminium because the carbon fibre options weren't so light as to justify the additional costs. They are also of the 8kg payload variety so not great for telephoto lenses of greater than 200mm

I also have a Manfrotto elements carbon fibre option. I like this one but it isnt massively weight bearing. Again a long tele isn't going to be particularly stable.


Here is a link to a KingJoy I have my eye on.

 
  • Like
Reactions: Buck987
I bought Manfrotto 055Xprob, no idea if it is made any more but I didn't over think it. Quick release legs, centre stem that can be used in a few interesting ways and a decent head on it with a quick release.
And don't forget it can be used as a mono pod. Avoided the carbon fibre in case it cracked. Usually carry the tripod hooked on my shoulder so no biggie in weight.

Though I have not used it since I bought the L 100-400.

edit. Always trued to use the remote release with the tripod though, for the scenery stuff.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Buck987
Avoided the carbon fibre in case it cracked. Usually carry the tripod hooked on my shoulder so no biggie in weight.

Carbon fiber is an incredibly durable material, and although I have heard of CF tripods cracking, it takes some serious abuse to do it at least on a quality one. The kind of situations that could break a CF tripod would also likely dent and/or bend an aluminum one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Buck987
I have an older manfrotto system (possibly the same as Alaska Moose's) that I bought early on to use with heavy dSLRs. It gets used around the house for still lifes or self portraits.

I also have a lightweight Manfrotto Be Free which is surprisingly stable for only having cost $100 at Costco as an impulse purchase. I have the aluminum version, but it fits into a suitcase for air travel. I've used it for beach shoots (family self portraits) and just jam it kind of far down in the sand for extra stability.

I don't use tripods a ton, but if you need one, you need one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kenoh and Buck987
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.