MP 1,1-5,1 Ridiculous low values in Geekbench 5

[Condor2409]

Hi, Ok - to make it short:

Upgraded my 4.1-> 5.1 MP from 8 core to 12 core with 2x X5680 CPU's
64 GB RAM - 1333 - DIMMS - 1+2, 5+6 // 4x 16GB
GC- GTX680/2GB
SSD - EVO 860 1 TB

Geekbench: Seems very low - any idea ? THX's for FB
Test with Geekbench 5 !!!

 

[tsialex]

Hi, Ok - to make it short:

Upgraded my 4.1-> 5.1 MP from 8 core to 12 core with 2x X5680 CPU's
64 GB RAM - 1333 - DIMMS - 1+2, 5+6 // 4x 16GB
GC- GTX680/2GB
SSD - EVO 860 1 TB

Geekbench: Seems very low - any idea ? THX's for FB View attachment 1698573

The values are correct, it's a 10~12 year old processor/platform. Nehalem/Westmere Xeons X58/5500 platform was released back in November 2008.

Even with all the Intel problems in the last decade, processors continued to evolve slowly over the years.

Btw, this is recurrent, use the search and you will find a lot of people doing the exact same post as you did…

 

[Condor2409]

The values are correct, it's a 10~12 year old processor/platform. Nehalem/Westmere Xeons X58/5500 platform was released back in November 2008.

Even with all the Intel problems in the last decade, processors continued to evolve slowly over the years.

Btw, this is recurrent, use the search and you will find a lot of people doing the exact same post as you did…

Yep your'e right. - the problem was the value numbering of Geekbench 4 to 5 - Above is 5 - the other one here is 4 -