AndyR said:
I actually think progress in the USA series such as CART/IRL has been quicker than F1 in terms of safety. There is no way that an F1 would stand upto an impact into a concreate wall like IRL/CART.
It was my understanding that F1 and IRL cars employ different philosophies as to there abilities to deal with high speed accidents.
F1 cars being stronger, stiffer structures (hence Schumachers injuries) whereas an IRL car are actually designed to break apart (not the safety cell of course) to help absorb the impact energy of running on ovals.
AndyR said:
Look at what happened to Ralf Schumacher at Indy a few years ago. Hit the turn 1 wall at about 150mph and broke bones in his back yet IRL can impact at almost 200mph and the driver can be unhurt.
Didn't Schumacher actually miss the SAFER barrier though? as the F1 cars run the opposite way around, I'm sure that Indianapolis in 2004 didn't have the SAFER barrier all the way around, and Schumacher was just unlucky in that he impacted the wall just after SAFER barrier ended, hence he ended up hitting unprotected concrete.
AndyR said:
Even so, accidents like Dana's, you just can't cater for as there is just too much energy involved.
It was an horrific one that's for sure... whether anything could have been done to better protect the driver though is another question that should always be discussed and considered after such an accident.
I'm probably wrong in this, but I recall reading that IRL use chassis for multiple years? if that is the case, are any significant changes done to the cars to improve their safety after a fatal crash? much in the same way as the sweeping changes (both to car and circuits) to F1 after Imola 1994, the following years cars saw significant changes, especially regarding the cockpit design of the cars.
3 years is a long time in such a sport.
It just seems that there has been a lot of fatalities in U.S. single seat racing over the last decade, and not always on ovals.