ok so here is the story, somehow Rogers managed to link my two brothers accounts together. The one Brother had been paying his contract while the other had not, upon reaching the allowed limit of not being payed both iphones (one 3G contract not paid) (one 3GS contract was continualy paid for ontime) were denied service.
so after they called Rogers and sorted out the accounts Brother x (hadnt been paying) was allowed service while Brother Y is still locked out of service.
thats the story, now my question.
My brother's idea is that after 2 weeks if Rogers has not provided service for a phone where the contract has been paid for on time and continualy, then that is a breach of contract on their part. so with that in mind his idea is that he will (upon two weeks of no service) will leave rogers pay no ETF and recieve a factory unlock.
is this at all plausible? I'm inclined to think not, but i thought i'd ask.
both accounts are obviously with Rogers.
so after they called Rogers and sorted out the accounts Brother x (hadnt been paying) was allowed service while Brother Y is still locked out of service.
thats the story, now my question.
My brother's idea is that after 2 weeks if Rogers has not provided service for a phone where the contract has been paid for on time and continualy, then that is a breach of contract on their part. so with that in mind his idea is that he will (upon two weeks of no service) will leave rogers pay no ETF and recieve a factory unlock.
is this at all plausible? I'm inclined to think not, but i thought i'd ask.
both accounts are obviously with Rogers.