Samsung didn't copy Apple--really

[Mapmonkey]

Thought I'd post this link to a site I found quite amusing. I'm not sure of the source of the guy's images but have seen similar stuff in ads and stores here in Samsung Land.

 

[AlphaHumanus]

This is the first I've seen most of those pictures/comparisons. Considering I've got no in-hand experience with samsung's products, (the only tech-savvy-ish person in my social circles) I didnt pay much attention to the whole fiasco outside of the verdict. That being said, WOW.

I'm of the opinion that may be throwing just a bit too much around litigation wise, but I would have wanted that ***** shut down too.

Also, WTF with the wheelchairs. Thats acceptable behavior for millionaires "over there?" Pitiful IMO. Class-less and sad.

 

[chambone]

Yes they did —really. And they aren't subtle about it either. The people that okayed all of this **** should be fired because they make Samsung as a company look like a bunch of idiots.

 

[G51989]

Yes they did —really. And they aren't subtle about it either. The people that okayed all of this **** should be fired because they make Samsung as a company look like a bunch of idiots.

Weather they copied or not ( I think they did some things ).

They have proven they are capable of making a better Phone ( Galaxy S3 ) than Apple can.

 

[NbinHD]

People, get over it. Samsung copied Apple a year ago, thats past. Look at the S3, its the image of Samsungs future. People are complaining about the angle of a photo that was used to advertise a product, that's taking it to far!

 

[flameproof]

Everybody copies to some extend. Without that technology would move way slower.

..but true, grandma can't tell the difference between an iPhone and a Samsung S3. Or any other mobile phone for that matter.

 

[thewitt]

Copying things that are not patented is fine. Copying things that are patented will get you sued.

It's that simple really.