Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

skaertus

macrumors 601
Original poster
Feb 23, 2009
4,252
1,409
Brazil
I have a Samsung Galaxy S8 and I consider it to be an inferior product to my iPhone X. The interface is clumsy and awkward, the battery life is pathetic, and I always find myself using saving battery features to extract more juice from the phone. I was not impressed by the Galaxy S9 and S10 either.

But I was at a store yesterday and I tried the new intermediate line of Samsung, the A-series. Somehow, they looked much more interesting than the S10. All the models that I tried (A10, A20, A30, A50 and A70) had big bright AMOLED screens, which looked even brighter than my S8. The resolution is not so high, but I suppose it makes no difference at all on a screen this size. The processor is slower, but they all seemed snappy. And the battery life, at about 4000 mAh, should be much better than both the S-series and the iPhone, especially because of the lower resolution display and slower processors.

And they were all cheap devices. I live in Brazil, but in the U.S. prices for these models seem to range from $130 to $375. A bargain compared to an iPhone X-series or a Galaxy S-series, which will cost at least some $800. I mean, of course these phones are slower and do not have the same kind of features. But this year they seem to have cover a lot of ground, and offer features that could provide a great experience. I may be wrong, as I did not have the chance to try extensively these phones. But they impressed me.

I wonder whether Apple and other manufacturers will be able to keep pushing $1,000+ prices on features which become subtler and more difficult to tell apart every year. I mean, an iPhone XR or XS may be as fast a desktop computer, but does it really matter if you are not running desktop applications, and does not even have an adequate screen to work on powerful software? And does a screen resolution of 3040x1440 (Galaxy S10) does even make sense on such a small screen, other to consume battery, especially when cheaper models offer a 2340x1080 screen, in which is also not possible to tell pixels apart? And does it really matter to have a phone built of premium materials (glass, stainless steel), when you are going to put it inside a case and will not even feel the sophisticated touch of such materials?

I mean, for how long will it make sense paying three to five times the price for a product whose differences are increasingly more difficult to tell apart? Would it be status alone?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Breaking Good

pika2000

Suspended
Jun 22, 2007
5,587
4,903
You think those Galaxy series are interesting value wise? Go check Xiaomi and Realme phones, and those A series are still overpriced for what they offer. Their remaining selling point is the OLED screens. They all lost their IP68 rating compared to previous iterations of the A series, and they use old SoCs which are nothing near the flagship exynos in terms of performance. Worse, they all will only get quarterly security updates at best. Samsung is pushed into the corner by the Chinese and end up cutting corners on the A series to keep their profits up.
 

skaertus

macrumors 601
Original poster
Feb 23, 2009
4,252
1,409
Brazil
You think those Galaxy series are interesting value wise? Go check Xiaomi and Realme phones, and those A series are still overpriced for what they offer. Their remaining selling point is the OLED screens. They all lost their IP68 rating compared to previous iterations of the A series, and they use old SoCs which are nothing near the flagship exynos in terms of performance. Worse, they all will only get quarterly security updates at best. Samsung is pushed into the corner by the Chinese and end up cutting corners on the A series to keep their profits up.

I suppose so. As I live in Brazil, there seems to be no Realme phone available here, even for testing. As for Xiaomi, there is a brand new store opened here in Sao Paulo, but I was not able to visit it yet.

Anyway, the OLED screen in the Samsung A-series phone is really good, much better than the ones in previous years. The absence of IP68 rating is a downturn, but it does not really bother me. One thing is to have a $1,000+ iPhone dead after being dropped in the pool; but a $200 Samsung is a phone to hit the streets. As for the chips being weak, they are definitely not top-notch, but a quick test revealed that some of them may be decent and faster than previous ones. Not sure, though. One thing is to use it for a few minutes at a store, and another completely different is to use it daily over a two-week period.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.