S smoledman macrumors 68000 Original poster Oct 17, 2011 1,943 364 Oct 4, 2012 #1 http://www.google.com/hostednews/af...docId=CNG.11dfe52b40f094180e54fca888002253.71 Safe to say, they are not going anywhere!
http://www.google.com/hostednews/af...docId=CNG.11dfe52b40f094180e54fca888002253.71 Safe to say, they are not going anywhere!
B BB.King macrumors regular Jun 29, 2012 199 42 London UK Oct 8, 2012 #2 That report say the profit is only from Samsung Electronics, which is one of many divisions of Samsung conglomerate.
That report say the profit is only from Samsung Electronics, which is one of many divisions of Samsung conglomerate.
ixodes macrumors 601 Jan 11, 2012 4,429 3 Pacific Coast, USA Oct 8, 2012 #3 Those specifics aside, many underestimate the depth of Samsung. An old, very well established global operation.
Those specifics aside, many underestimate the depth of Samsung. An old, very well established global operation.
charlieegan3 macrumors 68020 Feb 16, 2012 2,394 17 U.K Oct 8, 2012 #4 Well I just spent £530 on a Note 2 so that might have had something to do with it. ---------- ixodes said: Those specifics aside, many underestimate the depth of Samsung. An old, very well established global operation. Click to expand... Who just so happen to make great modern tech too.
Well I just spent £530 on a Note 2 so that might have had something to do with it. ---------- ixodes said: Those specifics aside, many underestimate the depth of Samsung. An old, very well established global operation. Click to expand... Who just so happen to make great modern tech too.
Rogifan macrumors Penryn Nov 14, 2011 24,862 32,519 Oct 8, 2012 #5 So are people going to start whining about Samsung products being overpriced?
S smoledman macrumors 68000 Original poster Oct 17, 2011 1,943 364 Oct 9, 2012 #6 Of course that's operating income, not EBITA. I expect that # is probably $6.8 billion, still a record for them.
Of course that's operating income, not EBITA. I expect that # is probably $6.8 billion, still a record for them.