I always take this guy’s stuff with a large pinch of salt. It feels like every year he says wow the new Samsungs are actually really good, but in reality he’s just setting them up to be destroyed once the iPhones come out 6 months later.
Here yes he’s giving the Ultra due credit especially for the zoom, low light scenes and bigger viewfinder, but overall I’d say he’s saying they’re mostly equal. Meaning that come new iPhone time = he’ll be laughing at the Ultra.
Personally I’m finding the daylight shots for the Ultra to look a bit washed out, and it seems to be adjusting visibly a good bit more than the iPhone resulting in weird little artifacts, on the grass for example.
I was also surprised to see the stabilization actually looking better on the iPhone in the walking scenes...?
In any case though, since I got the 11 Pro I’m realizing just how personal everyone’s preferences are, depending on
how they use the camera and what their aesthetic preferences are. Because to my surprise I’m not that happy with the 11 Pro cam. And I can’t tell you exactly why. I just find it awkward to take good photos with, it feels like it’s getting in my way a lot of the time.
One thing I definitely would love to have is the full screen viewfinder of the Ultra. I hate how cramped the iPhone UI feels. And yes, I would have killed for that 100x zoom last year when we suddenly spotted a group a wild horses about 500 meters away from us in the mountains.
So I guess I’m trying to say - take camera reviews with a massive grain of salt as personal preference really decides it in the end.
And, let’s see how long before this guy turns around and outright laughs at the Ultra...