I am hoping someone can give me the correct answer here to ensure I spend my money wisely
I am looking to upgrade the memory on my new 24" 2.4 Ghz iMac. The memory for this chip set according to crucial.com is PC2-6400 (800 mhz). Now, I know that the PC2-5300 (667 mhz) memory is backwards compatible and will work on the system, but I do not want to loose performance by downgrading what I have in there already (PC2-6400).
I have heard however that although the Santa Rose chipset has a FSB of 800 mhz, the memory controller is limited to 667 mhz. This would mean that the PC2-6400 is not using the full 800 mhz as it would be limited by the memory controller's speed of 667 mhz. So, I could purchase the PC2-5300 memory and it would have NO negative impact on performance. Considering the PC2-5300 is cheaper (and is readily available in 2 GB dimms), I would like to know if the above is accurate or if I am truly getting 800 mhz out of the memory controller to match the FSB.
Thanks!
-Jason
I am looking to upgrade the memory on my new 24" 2.4 Ghz iMac. The memory for this chip set according to crucial.com is PC2-6400 (800 mhz). Now, I know that the PC2-5300 (667 mhz) memory is backwards compatible and will work on the system, but I do not want to loose performance by downgrading what I have in there already (PC2-6400).
I have heard however that although the Santa Rose chipset has a FSB of 800 mhz, the memory controller is limited to 667 mhz. This would mean that the PC2-6400 is not using the full 800 mhz as it would be limited by the memory controller's speed of 667 mhz. So, I could purchase the PC2-5300 memory and it would have NO negative impact on performance. Considering the PC2-5300 is cheaper (and is readily available in 2 GB dimms), I would like to know if the above is accurate or if I am truly getting 800 mhz out of the memory controller to match the FSB.
Thanks!
-Jason