Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Robstevo

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Jun 7, 2014
472
722
Does anyone think it's going to be a tad bit hard/awkward trying to find apps on a small screen, by zooming In and out and scrolling through the tiny app icons?

On such a small screen wouldn't it have been a bit better to have simpler, larger icons that you can flip through ?
 

troop231

macrumors 603
Jan 20, 2010
5,826
560
Does anyone think it's going to be a tad bit hard/awkward trying to find apps on a small screen, by zooming In and out and scrolling through the tiny app icons?

On such a small screen wouldn't it have been a bit better to have simpler, larger icons that you can flip through ?

Yep, although I'm buying the watch to write apps, I do not believe the crown idea is a very ergonomic design. Also what they mentioned at the keynote about pinch to zoom obstructing your content; well no duh, that's why when you're done pinching you remove your fingers from the display. Just my .02 cents. :)
 

APlotdevice

macrumors 68040
Sep 3, 2011
3,145
3,861
Yep, although I'm buying the watch to write apps, I do not believe the crown idea is a very ergonomic design. Also what they mentioned at the keynote about pinch to zoom obstructing your content; well no duh, that's why when you're done pinching you remove your fingers from the display. Just my .02 cents. :)

It's hard to know exactly how much you've zoomed with a pinch-and-zoom if you can't see what you're doing. And there also isn't much room to spread your fingers. (especially on the smaller version)
 

troop231

macrumors 603
Jan 20, 2010
5,826
560
It's hard to know exactly how much you've zoomed with a pinch-and-zoom if you can't see what you're doing. And there also isn't much room to spread your fingers. (especially on the smaller version)

I bet pinching would be more pleasant to use than constantly turning a tiny crown in an unergonomic position (your other hand laying on top of the hand that your watch is on :) )
 

JayLenochiniMac

macrumors G5
Nov 7, 2007
12,819
2,390
New Sanfrakota
I bet pinching would be more pleasant to use than constantly turning a tiny crown in an unergonomic position (your other hand laying on top of the hand that your watch is on :) )

Before the iPhone, people thought using the touchscreen would be difficult too. I'm sure Apple has it all figured out.
 

troop231

macrumors 603
Jan 20, 2010
5,826
560
Before the iPhone, people thought using the touchscreen would be difficult too. I'm sure Apple has it all figured out.

Yes this is true. I'm sure they are refining the concept heavily these few months up til it goes on sale. If they perfect it, then I welcome a new and intuitive interface.
 

APlotdevice

macrumors 68040
Sep 3, 2011
3,145
3,861
I bet pinching would be more pleasant to use than constantly turning a tiny crown in an unergonomic position (your other hand laying on top of the hand that your watch is on :) )

Have you ever tried using two fingers on a 6th gen iPod nano? That's basically the same screen size as the smaller :apple:Watch, and using two fingers on it could hardly be considered pleasant.
 

Robstevo

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Jun 7, 2014
472
722
You don't have to use the scroll, it's a touch screen and you can touch which app you want to open.

Yes I know but I'm talking about the zooming in an out action and the moving about to find the right app. On such a small screen I think it will turn out to be too much of a hassle.
 

bransoj

macrumors 68000
Jul 31, 2013
1,562
739
Yes I know but I'm talking about the zooming in an out action and the moving about to find the right app. On such a small screen I think it will turn out to be too much of a hassle.

I suspect it will be one of those things that after a short time of using it will become very natural plus the stuff you use a lot will be easier to find.
 

sulpfiction

macrumors 68040
Aug 16, 2011
3,077
603
Philadelphia Area
I bet pinching would be more pleasant to use than constantly turning a tiny crown in an unergonomic position (your other hand laying on top of the hand that your watch is on :) )

I don't think so. I think the crown is a great idea. From what i've read it's not cumbersome, or awkward at all. It's not really that tiny. I am going to reserve judgement until after I've had the chance to play with one. But if im choosing between "pinch to zoom" vs "twist the crown", Crown wins by a landslide. I think I would HATE using finger gestures on such a small screen.
 

Night Spring

macrumors G5
Jul 17, 2008
14,858
8,037
On such a small screen wouldn't it have been a bit better to have simpler, larger icons that you can flip through ?

If you had larger icons, you will be flipping forever to find the app you want. The zooming in and out makes sense -- you zoom out to navigate, limiting the amount of distance you have to scroll, then zoom in to select.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.