Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

remiller

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Mar 22, 2019
17
2
USA
I’m wondering to what extent the SDXC card slot on the 2019 27” iMac can serve as another solid state drive? Guessing that’s not the intended use, but I can’t think of any reason why data could not be stored on a SDXC card kept in the slot? Comments?
 

AZhappyjack

Suspended
Jul 3, 2011
10,183
23,657
Happy Jack, AZ
Go for it... no reason not to, except for the storage capacity of an SDXC car... it will be slower than your internal SSD, and more prone to failure... but for some short term storage, it will work...
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: remiller

remiller

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Mar 22, 2019
17
2
USA
Since posting the question, I searched the forum and found folks successfully using a card that way in a MacBook, etc. (I should have searched prior to posting. Apologize for wasting the bandwidth.) I guess the question then becomes is there a limit to the capacity of the card that the Mac can address? This approach to having files readily at hand without consuming internal SSD space seems like a good thing to me.
 

chabig

macrumors G4
Sep 6, 2002
11,460
9,326
The card will be tens of times slower than the internal SSD and more prone to failure. Make sure you keep multiple copies of that data.
 
  • Like
Reactions: remiller

macduke

macrumors G5
Jun 27, 2007
13,484
20,592
Yeah the reader is UHS-I which is only around 100MB/s and generally aren’t made for as many write cycles. Mechanical drives are actually faster these days between 150-200MB/s. The SSD in the last iMac was about 2,800MB/s so this would should be at least that fast, if not faster. You’d be better off if you want to save money getting an enclosure for a 2.5” SSD at 550MB/s or a blade enclosure at around 1GB/s.
 

Rockadile

macrumors 6502a
Jun 11, 2012
501
210
I don't see any problems using it as "cold storage" or for brisk use.

Besides the speed as mentioned, the other issue is heat. I know my thumb drives get hot after a longer transfer.
Transfer speeds will get slower throughout the process.

If you're trying to use it as an active storage, get the cards with the pro/high endurance label. These are normally for continuous video recording so they will have better resistance to heat and memory life.
 
  • Like
Reactions: remiller

chscag

macrumors 601
Feb 17, 2008
4,622
1,946
Fort Worth, Texas
The card will be tens of times slower than the internal SSD and more prone to failure. Make sure you keep multiple copies of that data.

This. I totally agree. There is no way I would use a SDXC card to store valuable data without having backups. I have had SDXC cards fail out of the blue. If you're thinking about ordering a new 2019 iMac, spend the extra bucks and get a large SSD instead; at least 1TB.
 
  • Like
Reactions: remiller

Fishrrman

macrumors Penryn
Feb 20, 2009
29,279
13,377
Even the fastest SD cards aren't going to be "that fast" in the Mac's slot.

You'd do better to buy a USB3 SSD, and use that.

No matter what you choose, as mentioned above, if there's anything critical on it, you'll STILL want to "back it up" to another drive.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigMcGuire

theluggage

macrumors G3
Jul 29, 2011
8,021
8,465
I’m wondering to what extent the SDXC card slot on the 2019 27” iMac can serve as another solid state drive?

Well, it will work - plenty of Android phones, Raspberry Pis, set-top boxes etc. use SD cards for this. The speed and durability issues brought up by others in this thread are valid, though. Certainly not a backup solution - you'll need some sort of external HD/SSD, NAS or cloud storage anyway.

I'd say the best application was something like a personal media library - bulky files, infrequently updated and .mp3s and .mp4s compressed for streaming won't care about the slow speed and (maybe) no animals are harmed if you loose it. If you have an iMac with a small-ish SSD and just want tunes while you work, it doesn't sound like a bad idea for the price.
 

mj_

macrumors 68000
May 18, 2017
1,618
1,281
Austin, TX
Yeah the reader is UHS-I which is only around 100MB/s and generally aren’t made for as many write cycles. Mechanical drives are actually faster these days between 150-200MB/s.
Sequential read & writes: yes.
Random read & writes: no.

The question is: what do you need more often? And the answer is random. Sequential reading and writing is very rare on a modern computer. Booting the OS, launching applications, or loading and saving files are always random read & write operations because the data required is never neatly organized in a sequential strip of blocks but spread all over the rotating platters. That's why an SD card can feel much faster than a mechanical hard drive: its random read & write times can be hundreds of times faster than those of a mechanical hard drive.

That said I absolutely agree with the reliability statement made before. Make sure to keep a backup copy somewhere and make sure to make regular backups of those files. SD cards are much more likely to fail than SSDs or mechanical hard drives.
 

dwig

macrumors 6502a
Jan 4, 2015
908
449
Key West FL
While I agree with the reliablity statements in general, I have to take issue with the general tone of those comments. If data is valuable you need backups, period. Even the internal SSD or HDD is no where near reliable enough to not need a backup. Just include the SD card in your backup routine. Keep in mind that these cards are the standard storage for all modern digital cameras where they get heavy use and have proven rather reliable.

I've used micro SD cards for various sizes as additional storage on my old Dell Venue 8 Pro (8" Windows tablet) and my current Surface Go has a 128Gb card. Both devices are designed to store the cards permanantly, they mount flush or resessed. I genereally store pictures, documents, and videos on the cards along with a few utilities. In the ~5 years of daily use between the 2 devices, I've never had an issue. The first card in the Dell was used for 2+ years before being replaced with a larger card. The cards are slower than the internal drives (eMMC in the case of the DV8p and NVMI in the case of the Go), but they have still been up to the task for watching 1080p videos.
 

hfg

macrumors 68040
Dec 1, 2006
3,621
312
Cedar Rapids, IA. USA
I use a SD card to hold my iTunes music library to save space on the speedy internal 2TB SSD. Since it is inconvenient to reach the card slot on the back of the 2017 iMac, I use a separate SDXC-II/CF card reader that is easily accessible in front. There is no speed issue with music files.
 

Rockadile

macrumors 6502a
Jun 11, 2012
501
210
I use a SD card to hold my iTunes music library to save space on the speedy internal 2TB SSD. Since it is inconvenient to reach the card slot on the back of the 2017 iMac, I use a separate SDXC-II/CF card reader that is easily accessible in front. There is no speed issue with music files.
Search "imac front usb" on amazon. There are 3rd-party hubs that makes the ports and slot to face forward ;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: hfg
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.