Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

joe19812

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Feb 26, 2008
24
2
I'm going to be upgrading from a 2009 MBP to a new MBA. I plan to keep the MBP to use as storage for the bulk of my seldom used files and media files such as iTunes, movies, pictures, etc sort of like an HTPC. We'll have a couple of MBA's utilizing the MBP file storage and also an AppleTV for movie playback.
Should I setup the MBP as a server for this or just keep it as standard OS X?
 

dimme

macrumors 68040
Feb 14, 2007
3,266
32,200
SF, CA
for basic file server duties regular OS X is just fine, If you want to add a centralized time machine backup then you will need OS X server.
 

Altemose

macrumors G3
Mar 26, 2013
9,189
488
Elkton, Maryland
I'm going to be upgrading from a 2009 MBP to a new MBA. I plan to keep the MBP to use as storage for the bulk of my seldom used files and media files such as iTunes, movies, pictures, etc sort of like an HTPC. We'll have a couple of MBA's utilizing the MBP file storage and also an AppleTV for movie playback.
Should I setup the MBP as a server for this or just keep it as standard OS X?



Standard client OS X is just fine for this. However, you may find it is better to invest in an NAS for the file storage.
 

rmackner

macrumors member
Oct 28, 2014
66
3
I'm going to be upgrading from a 2009 MBP to a new MBA. I plan to keep the MBP to use as storage for the bulk of my seldom used files and media files such as iTunes, movies, pictures, etc sort of like an HTPC. We'll have a couple of MBA's utilizing the MBP file storage and also an AppleTV for movie playback.
Should I setup the MBP as a server for this or just keep it as standard OS X?

The only benefit to a server is folder access security with usernames, a raid card to allow raiding of hard drives for faster access (and redundancy), DNS/DHCP, VPN access and calendar syncing. But your router can cover the networking aspect of a server and most newer NAS storage devices allow folder security. And if you don't have more then 15-20 workstations accessing the server's shared drives a NAS will be way more then sufficient.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.