In light of Mark Gurman's recent report that Apple was working on developing touchscreen Macs (which we previously thought was never going to happen), would it be too much to ask if Macs got Apple Pencil support? If I bought a MacBook Pro with Apple Pencil support and the ability to run Procreate, I'd sell my iPad Pro. What's the point of iPads anymore? No matter how high end the hardware is, the iPad is always going to be a bad computer and it's Apple's fault because they keep neglecting the software, especially considering that the iPad is now no longer less expensive than a decently specced laptop. Besides, most Macs have much more screen real estate than an iPad, so you have more freedom to draw a masterpiece. Even if the iPad had decent software, the software upgrade would nuke the iPad's already terrible battery life to the point of being unusable when unplugged, so the battery life of recent MacBooks would be a huge advantage anyways. So why not just give the MacBook Pro Apple Pencil support (and maybe Face ID if you can figure out how to fit the components into such a thin display lid) and call it a day?
Why SHOULDN'T them get Apple Pencil support?
Apple's decision of restricting the Apple Pencil only to the iPad seems bizarre, IMHO. They should at least have allowed them to work with the iPhone.
Their reasoning is always that they want to tie the Apple Pencil to the iPad, so that you would be compelled to buy it.
But IMHO, they are shooting themselves in the foot. The Apple Pencil is one of the best stylii ever created, but most artists won't really buy an iPad just for the Apple Pencil. Most of them will either buy a Huion tablet, a standalone stylus or a Wacom Cintiq, which are more flexible.
If they allowed the Apple Pencil to work everywhere, it would be one more argument in favor of it. And with it working with the Macbook, the very least we could do is to least sign documents more easily.
No matter how high end the hardware is, the iPad is always going to be a bad computer [...]
If Apple doesn't watch out, they are going to be left behind, plain and simple.
This is entirely Apple's fault and pride, because it's clear at this point the iPad has the capacity to run a desktop-class operating system. For example, the hypervisor IS available to the iPad, but Apple will artificially restrict it so users will be forced to run virtual machines (and full-blown OSes) with a Macbook.
What they haven't considered is that tablets from competitors are catching up. The Surface is not as powerful yet, but it's getting faster and faster, and the i7 version has eGPU support and can connect to full-blown Windows. So it has far more uses cases.
Samsung's alternative, the Galaxy S7, DOESN'T have a full-blown desktop OS, but at least it functions more like a Desktop OS when docked, allowing Windows to be aligned as you wish.