I just don't know which to get. The nikkor is $1000 more here in Canada but is it really worth it? The sigma has macro to get that extra fine tuning... thoughts please?
I just don't know which to get. The nikkor is $1000 more here in Canada but is it really worth it? The sigma has macro to get that extra fine tuning... thoughts please?
I love my 80-200 2.8, but I've also always wanted a 70-200 VR. If I had to do it all over again, I'd have spent the extra dough and bought the 70-200 in the first place. The 80-200 is an awesome piece of machinery though.
As always whenever someone brings up this question, I'd suggest you at least consider the Nikon 80-200mm f/2.8 D. New, they're around the same price as the Sigma (maybe a little more), and good used copies can be had for less. The only thing they don't have is a built-in focus motor and VR.