Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

safelder

macrumors member
Original poster
Jan 9, 2010
78
0
Is it just me, or does ML have a much smaller footprint than Lion? I'll have to check against the mirror of my drive, but I feel like I reclaimed 10GB or so with the upgrade today.
 

safelder

macrumors member
Original poster
Jan 9, 2010
78
0
Did this smaller footprint relate at all to RAM or just HD space?

Hard drive space. I have my system and apps installed on a 60GB OWC SDD. Roughly speaking (again, best guess based on my recollection, but I can confirm against the CCC clone I have at home in case of emergency), I had about 30 GB free under Lion. I now have about 40 GB free, with part of the used space taken up by the ML upgrade downloader so I can burn an emergency USB drive at some point.

I don't think I've ever seen an OS upgrade that reduces the space used...
 

Captin Crass

macrumors newbie
Jul 25, 2012
4
0
Colorado
Hard drive space. I have my system and apps installed on a 60GB OWC SDD. Roughly speaking (again, best guess based on my recollection, but I can confirm against the CCC clone I have at home in case of emergency), I had about 30 GB free under Lion. I now have about 40 GB free, with part of the used space taken up by the ML upgrade downloader so I can burn an emergency USB drive at some point.

I don't think I've ever seen an OS upgrade that reduces the space used...

I noticed that same 10GB bump in HD space switching from Leopard to Snow leopard.

I just wish I could find out if ML takes as big a bite out memory as Lion did. I'm maxed out at only 4GB and Lion takes 2GB just to run without any apps launched.
 

safelder

macrumors member
Original poster
Jan 9, 2010
78
0
I noticed that same 10GB bump in HD space switching from Leopard to Snow leopard.

I just wish I could find out if ML takes as big a bite out memory as Lion did. I'm maxed out at only 4GB and Lion takes 2GB just to run without any apps launched.

I haven't checked RAM usage. I've got an 8GB system (early 2011 15" MBP), and I believe I could take it to 16GB if necessary, so it's a non-issue to me.
 

Captin Crass

macrumors newbie
Jul 25, 2012
4
0
Colorado
I haven't checked RAM usage. I've got an 8GB system (early 2011 15" MBP), and I believe I could take it to 16GB if necessary, so it's a non-issue to me.

Yeah personally I think for now 8GB is the sweet spot.

I'm one of the many who have been waiting for the elusive 2012 iMac refresh, until then I have to cut every resource corner I can :(
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.