Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

DarkNetworks

macrumors 68000
Original poster
Apr 12, 2005
1,527
0
Well, i'm thinking of getting a 2nd camera and i'm wondering which one is better and anyone has one of these? Opinions? Is Olympus or Sony better?


For the Sony DSC S40
Resolution: 4.23 Mpixel
Maximum resolution: 2304x1728
Minimum resolution: 640x480
Sensor size: 1/2.7-inch
Sensor type: Super HAD CCD
Optical zoom: 3X
Focal length multiplier: n/a
Zoom wide (mm): 32
Zoom tele (mm): 96
Digital zoom: 6X
Auto focus: Yes
Manual focus: No
Focus range (cm): 12
Flash modes: anti red-eye, auto, fill in, off, slow flash
Storage types: Memory Stick, Memory Stick Pro
ISO ratings: auto, 80, 100, 200, 400
Aperture priority: No
Minimum aperture wide: f2.8
Maximum aperture wide: unknown
Minimum aperture tele: f5.1
Maximum aperture tele: unknown
Shutter priority: No
Minimum shutter (sec): 1
Maximum shutter (sec): 1/2000
Sequence (fps): unknown
Built-in flash: Yes
External flash: Yes
External flash type: n/a
Metering: Multi-pattern, spot
Exposure compensation: -2EV - +2EV with 1/3EV steps
White balance: auto, cloudy, daylight, fluorescent, incandescent
Video function: Yes
Video sound: Yes
Maximum video resolution: 640x480
Minimum video resolution: 160x112
Frames per second (fps): 30
Voice recording: No
Optical viewfinder: Yes
Electronic viewfinder: No
LCD size: 1.5-inch
LCD resolution (pixels): 76,800
Self-timer: Yes
USB: USB 2.0
Video out: No
File format: JPEG
Energy: 2x AA
Weight: 132g.
Sizes (mm): 99x51.7x34.2

For Olympus Camedia FE-100
Max resolution: 2272 x 1704
Low resolution: 1600 x 1200, 640 x 480
Image ratio w:h: 4:3
Effective pixels: 4.0 million
Sensor size: 1/2.5 "
Sensor type: CCD
ISO rating: Auto (64 - 320)
Zoom wide (W): 35 mm
Zoom tele (T): 106 mm (3X)
Digital zoom: 4X
Image stabilization: No
Auto Focus: Yes
Manual Focus: No
Auto focus type: TTL
Normal focus range: 50 cm
Macro focus range: 5 cm
White balance override: 5 positions
Aperture range: F3.0 - F5.0
Min shutter: 2 sec
Max shutter: 1/2000 sec
Built-in Flash: Yes
Flash guide no: 3.8 m (12.4 ft) 8 m
Flash modes: Auto, Red-Eye, Forced, Off, Slow 1&3
Exposure compensation: -2 EV to +2 EV in 1/3 EV steps
Metering: Center-weighted
Aperture priority: No
Shutter priority: No
Movie Clips: Yes, 320 x 240, 15 fps, unlimited
Remote control: No
Self-timer: Yes
Time-lapse recording: No
Orientation sensor: No
Storage types: xD Picture Card + Internal 28 MB Memory
Uncompressed format: No
Compressed format: JPEG (EXIF 2.2)
Quality Levels: Standard, High, Super High
Viewfinder: No
LCD: 1.5"
LCD Pixels: 130,000
Playback zoom: Unknown
Video out: Yes
USB: Yes
Battery / Charger: Yes
Battery: AA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)
Weight (inc. batteries): 160 g (5.6 oz)
Dimensions: 88 x 63 x 39 mm (3.5 x 2.5 x 1.5 in)

Both not really the high end camera's but i pretty much just want to take some normal photographs...
 

kiwi-in-uk

macrumors 6502a
Sep 22, 2004
735
0
AU
Canon.

But - more constructively - why don't you check out dpreview - they have plenty of information about all types of digital cameras, and some excellent forums. Also have a look at "Digital Camera Resource" and "Steve's Digicams", both of which are on the DPReview links page.

Most of the big name brands are pretty good these days (although each has its share of clunker models - which is where the forums are useful). To a large extent it comes down to which make/model you feel most comfortable using.

In my case I preferred Nikon 35mm, but now prefer Canon digital.

Good luck.
 

gammamonk

macrumors 6502a
Jun 4, 2004
667
108
Madison, WI
I'm a sony fan for digital cameras. I have a Cybershot V1, and it's great. You can see lots of samples on my website. Highly scaled down for the web of course. (The pics that look all grainy are from my cell-phone)

If you just wanna get a good deal, check out dealsea. There's always some crazy deals on there. There's a nice Canon for $204 right now.
 

GilGrissom

macrumors 65816
Mar 13, 2005
1,042
1
I have a sony 5 Megapixel camera. P9 or P10. Its quite good, but the lense seems a bit loose.

We're just brought my sister a Fuji-film 6Mpx camera for her birthday, £150, and its simply superb!! Instant picture taking (unlike the Sony, it takes ages to get into focus).

Apparently the latest Sony ones are very good though, with the special lenses (Carl Zeiss Vario-Tessar?) but I've never used them.

Ive been much happier with my sisters Fuji camera than my Sony one.

Use quite a lot of Olympus ones at work, they are quite safe to use, straight forward and get the job done! Seem much better built aswell compared to my Sony one. They are more rounded and robust. Usually better value too!
 

puckhead193

macrumors G3
May 25, 2004
9,578
862
NY
my friend has a olylmpus and i hate it. The UI is dreedfull. and the pictures don't look good for a 3 MPs. I have a 2 MP which looks better then her 3MP. Either go for nikon or canon.
 

Applespider

macrumors G4
I'm about to buy a Fuji F10 when I get round to getting to the store. Apparently, you need to play a little to get great results but some of them are stunning.

Go and have a look at pbase.com and check out the images from the cameras that you're considering. You'll get to see the shots that people take in the real world - and since they usually have the full EXIF data, you can compare how the different cameras cope with conditions (ie does full auto mean over/under exposure etc)
 

ziwi

macrumors 65816
Jan 6, 2004
1,087
0
Right back where I started...
It is mostly subjective. I agree with the poster above who said look to dpreview.com and stevesdigicams.com. There you can read reviews and look in the forums for specific info on the two cameras you are interested in.
 

Abstract

macrumors Penryn
Dec 27, 2002
24,889
921
Location Location Location
Haha, I love these threads:

"I have narrowed it down to 2 options: Sony or Olympus. Which one should I choose?"
"Nikon!" :p

From these options, I'd choose Sony. I think their cameras are quite good. My ex-girlfriend's Sony was as good, or arguably better than my Canon IXUS40 (or SD300, I believe), particularly at low to mid lighting.

Actually, I think that any of the new, small to midsized point-and-shoot cameras will give comparable results. Its just the menu system and options that are the deciding factor for me.

Sony isn't bad, but I find that their LCD isn't as good as on my Canon.
 

finalcoolman

macrumors 6502
Apr 15, 2005
254
0
I love Sony digital cameras. Now for those who don't, guess what. Chances are one of the most important components in your camera is made by Sony, no matter what brand it its. Most of the digital camera CCDs are made by Sony. Bassicly that Olympus camera has a Sony CCD. Same with any Nikon cameras people are recommending. Here is a good thread about this:

http://groups.google.ca/group/rec.p...why+does+sony+sell+ccd&hl=en#41261922b6bd6513
 

finalcoolman

macrumors 6502
Apr 15, 2005
254
0
The S40 is alright, but the new S60 and S90 are stupid. The P73 and 93A wre much better. As someone said all companies have their bland models but in general I love Sony Cybershot cameras. Now for those who don't, guess what. Chances are one of the most important components in your camera is made by Sony, no matter what your preferred brand is. Most of the digital camera CCDs are made by Sony. Basicly that Olympus camera has a Sony CCD. Same with any Nikon cameras people are recommending. Here is a good thread about this issue:

http://groups.google.ca/group/rec.p...why+does+sony+sell+ccd&hl=en#41261922b6bd6513

Edit: Ooops, tried to edit but instead did a duplicate post...sorry
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.