Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Grasbak

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Jan 17, 2006
434
16
UK
i would like to get into photography - general pics, landscapes and some wildlife. I was thinking of getting the Canon D1000. Scanning the internet, there doesnt seem to be many savings around.

It seems recently Canon have pushed up the price (from £350 to £400) - the kit lens changes from the IS version to the non-IS. I popped into my local currys and they found one of the old IS version about a 20min drive away.

They also have some deals running. I have a couple of questions:

1. is the IS version better that the non-IS?

2. For £477 I can get the IS Canon 18-mm plus tamrom 70-300 and a 4gb card. Seems pretty good. Just need a bag, so I would be looking at £500. I am thinking this would cover all my needs to start with. Any thoughts?

Thanks
 

joro

macrumors 68020
Jun 11, 2009
2,361
41
Virginia
Yes, by leaps and bounds. The IS version is a very capable starter lens. It is much sharper than its predecessor, and having the IS is extremely helpful if you won't be using a tripod a lot.

I agree, I think especially for someone starting in photography having the IS will allow you more degrees of flexibility and won’t tie you down to a tripod.
 

Grasbak

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Jan 17, 2006
434
16
UK
Yes, by leaps and bounds. The IS version is a very capable starter lens. It is much sharper than its predecessor, and having the IS is extremely helpful if you won't be using a tripod a lot.

Seems a shame they have removed it from the std kit now!

Cost savings I guess.

Do you have any thoughts on the other other lens?

I guess I am getting it for about £100.
 

leighonigar

macrumors 6502a
May 5, 2007
908
1
The tamron will be *OK* none of those cheap 70-300mm zooms are great but can take good pics if you're careful.

Generally the mfrs own lenses are better - Nikon's 50-200mm VR and whatever the canon is called... 50-250 or something. But they cost more.
 

Grasbak

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Jan 17, 2006
434
16
UK
The tamron will be *OK* none of those cheap 70-300mm zooms are great but can take good pics if you're careful.

Generally the mfrs own lenses are better - Nikon's 50-200mm VR and whatever the canon is called... 50-250 or something. But they cost more.

Thanks everyone for the help. Took the trip to get the IS 18-55. Must be one of the last ones out there! Got the tamron 70-300. Felt like I couldn't refuse for the price.

Now to take some pics!
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.