Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Unspeaked

macrumors 68020
Original poster
Dec 29, 2003
2,448
1
West Coast
I thought this was especially fitting with the recent post about being mugged for an iPhone.

A study released this morning is suggesting a rise in violent crime that started in 2005/2006 directly corrolates to the rise in popularity of Apple's iPod music players.

Here's a link to The Washington Post article:

LINK

BOSTON -- It's easy to see why iPods would be alluring targets for criminals: The music players are valuable and easy to resell, and people absorbed in their personal soundtracks can be vulnerably oblivious to their surroundings.

But could the temptation for stealing iPods be so strong that they're behind an increase in the crime rate? Researchers at a public policy institute say yes.
 
I thought this was especially fitting with the recent post about being mugged for an iPhone.

A study released this morning is suggesting a rise in violent crime that started in 2005/2006 directly corrolates to the rise in popularity of Apple's iPod music players.

Here's a link to The Washington Post article:

LINK


I'd suggest that any rise in crime* would correlate to the proliferation of small, valuable, portable electronics (Smartphones, GPS units, and PDAs of all brands -not just those branded "iPod").



*If in fact there is a rise in crime in the first place:

First, I'd argue there probably isn't any real rise in crime. Perhaps the number of crimes reported (because the victim loses something of value as opposed to a wallet or watch that may not be worth it to report) has increased.

Even if there is a rise in crimes of this sort, it doesn't mean it has anything to do with iPods. Always remember this when looking a studies that "suggest" something: Correlation is not causation.

That means that 2 events that happen at the same time (correlation) are not necessarily (or, one could argue, often) a result of each other (causation).

After all, I could do a study that "suggests" a rise in crime correlates to an increased consumption of potato chips. Or that a rise in crude oil futures correlates to when I get haircuts.



Edit after reading the article:

The writer seems to cover some of my points in page 2 of that article... I must applaud that! Usually journalists run with the meaty implication of these studies, rather than look at them skeptically. By and large, this is a pretty well-balanced article.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.