Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

AJ Muni

macrumors 65816
Original poster
Aug 4, 2005
1,153
24
Miami
I have the stock 1.83 new intel imac, and i want to use handbrake to rip some of my dvd's so i can put them onto my ipod. I want some suggestions on which settings i can use for good quality on my ipod for playback, and also test the power of this puppy. Thanks I'll be waiting....
 

AJ Muni

macrumors 65816
Original poster
Aug 4, 2005
1,153
24
Miami
Well I did a test of my own....and heres the screenshot..P.S. This was my first time using handbrake and I used 320x192....but which is the correct size so it can fit onto my video ipod perfectly???
 

Attachments

  • Picture 1.png
    Picture 1.png
    132.8 KB · Views: 156

powerbook911

macrumors 601
Mar 15, 2005
4,003
383
AJ Muni said:
Well I did a test of my own....and heres the screenshot..P.S. This was my first time using handbrake and I used 320x192....but which is the correct size so it can fit onto my video ipod perfectly???


That should work. However, up there in the top right you might want to change from regular MPEG4 to H264. It will take longer to encode, but look a lot better.
 

AJ Muni

macrumors 65816
Original poster
Aug 4, 2005
1,153
24
Miami
The process took 37 minutes for part 1, and another 45 minutes for part 2...is this normal? 1 1/2 hour for ripping a dvd...even on this intel imac???
 

jsw

Moderator emeritus
Mar 16, 2004
22,910
44
Andover, MA
AJ Muni said:
The process took 37 minutes for part 1, and another 45 minutes for part 2...is this normal? 1 1/2 hour for ripping a dvd...even on this intel imac???
That's reasonable. Are you using version Version 0.7.1-cvs (2005110400)? That's the latest Intel version I'm aware of.

Note that you're not only ripping the DVD but also converting it to a different format and resizing it, so it'll take a while.
 

matperk

macrumors 6502
May 6, 2004
443
0
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
AJ Muni said:
The process took 37 minutes for part 1, and another 45 minutes for part 2...is this normal? 1 1/2 hour for ripping a dvd...even on this intel imac???

Yeah that's pretty normal. If you want to do a few dvds, I suggest using the queue feature--set it up to do a few, and then go to sleep. You just have to rip the .vob files from the dvd to the hd first. It's an extra step, but it's a good way to get a lot of things done while you're not using the computer at night.
 

GoCubsGo

macrumors Nehalem
Feb 19, 2005
35,742
155
AJ Muni said:
The process took 37 minutes for part 1, and another 45 minutes for part 2...is this normal? 1 1/2 hour for ripping a dvd...even on this intel imac???
Yes because it's not all about the speed of your machine. I can rip a 2.5 hour movie on windows xp 2.4ghz with 1.5 gig ram in about 1.5 hours. Same for my powerbook.

Encoding takes a while regardless of your system. The lower your settings the faster it'll be. For me it's rip anywhere from 17 to 50 minutes and then encode anywhere from 30 to 1.25 hours so far. That depends on the movie as well. One 90 min movie took much less time than another. I don't know why, but it did.

Not to mention your intel mac, the speed specs I don't think are as fast as they reported. That's just a personal opinion. Not that you don't have a great machine, I just don't know if I buy 4-5x faster.
 

Josh396

macrumors 65816
Oct 16, 2004
1,129
0
Peoria/Chicago, IL
AJ Muni said:
This was my first time using handbrake and I used 320x192....but which is the correct size so it can fit onto my video ipod perfectly???
If you use H.264 the maximum resolution you can use is 320x240. If you use MPEG-4 you can go up to 480x480 but I suggest sticking with 320x240 either way unless you plan on using a video cable to connect it to your TV. The 480x480 resolution will show up better on your TV but it will result in a boxed mode on your iPod. I've only hooked it up to a TV once or twice so I decided to stick with 320x240 for the better picture on my iPod.
 

Josh396

macrumors 65816
Oct 16, 2004
1,129
0
Peoria/Chicago, IL
jessica. said:
Not to mention your intel mac, the speed specs I don't think are as fast as they reported. That's just a personal opinion. Not that you don't have a great machine, I just don't know if I buy 4-5x faster.
Well the iMacs were never reported to be 4-5x faster. Apple said they were 2-3x faster then the previous generation of iMacs. The new Powerbooks (Macbook Pro) are reported to be 4-5x faster then the G4 Powerbooks they are replacing.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.