Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

xraydoc

Contributor
Oct 9, 2005
11,030
5,491
192.168.1.1
While I'm not defending an OS that requires 41GB of space in its base, factory image, it's much like Apple's 64GB MacBook Air -- it doesn't actually ship with 64GB of free space either.

But yes, 41GB down the drain is pretty ridiculous.
 

roxxette

macrumors 68000
Aug 9, 2011
1,507
0
It comes with software pre-installed including the office suite so maybe that have something to do ? I know you can delete all of those things.
 

Fernandez21

macrumors 601
Jun 16, 2010
4,840
3,183
41 gb is a lot. Windows 7 on my MacBook takes up only 24gb. Is windows 8 that bloated?
 

Michael Goff

Suspended
Jul 5, 2012
13,329
7,422
41 gb is a lot. Windows 7 on my MacBook takes up only 24gb. Is windows 8 that bloated?

I have about 33GB used on my MBA with Windows 8. That's with all of their apps, a couple of others, and a lot of things on the desktop (3 alternative web browsers, libre office 4.0, trillian, thunderbird).

I guess it's the recovery partition.
 

MuffCabbage

macrumors regular
Nov 11, 2012
197
23
The extra probably ~10gb is the recovery which can be deleted if you want. You just want a backup first.

Sent from my HTC6990LVW using Board Express
 
Last edited:

Liquorpuki

macrumors 68020
Jun 18, 2009
2,286
8
City of Angels
It comes with software pre-installed including the office suite so maybe that have something to do ? I know you can delete all of those things.

No Office suite on the Pro, you have to buy it

Anyone know if there's a size difference between the Pro and Consumer versions of Win 8?
 

Xiroteus

macrumors 65816
Mar 31, 2012
1,297
76
Ouch, I thought it would take up around 20GB, it will have to hit 256GB to really get some space. I imagine a fair bit can be deleted.
 

mrsir2009

macrumors 604
Sep 17, 2009
7,505
156
Melbourne, Australia
But it's deceptive, and dishonest to advertised a professional product as containing 64gb of space when it clearly does not.

It wouldn't be advertised as having 64GB of space - It'd be advertised as having a 64GB SSD drive. I mean, no device has exactly as much usable space as their is drive space. iDevices still have a fairly significant chunk cut off the drive space for the OS. But of course, I do agree that the amount taken up by the "OS" in this case is insane.
 

Xiroteus

macrumors 65816
Mar 31, 2012
1,297
76
There likely has to be a point where it does become deceptive, 23GB of 64GB is bad, using 10GB would be bad enough.
 

bookwormsy

macrumors 6502
Jul 7, 2010
281
172
It wouldn't be advertised as having 64GB of space - It'd be advertised as having a 64GB SSD drive. I mean, no device has exactly as much usable space as their is drive space. iDevices still have a fairly significant chunk cut off the drive space for the OS. But of course, I do agree that the amount taken up by the "OS" in this case is insane.

But nothing else makes up 2/3 of the free space. If you buy a 32gb iPhone, you expect the get roughly 32gb. And you do: you get 29ish. A consumer expecting 64 and seeing 23 would probably be a little mad.
 

mrsir2009

macrumors 604
Sep 17, 2009
7,505
156
Melbourne, Australia
But nothing else makes up 2/3 of the free space. If you buy a 32gb iPhone, you expect the get roughly 32gb. And you do: you get 29ish. A consumer expecting 64 and seeing 23 would probably be a little mad.

Yeah, I think there'd be MS Office along with a ton of other apps pre-installed. I mean, something has to fill it.
 

jav6454

macrumors Core
Nov 14, 2007
22,303
6,264
1 Geostationary Tower Plaza
But nothing else makes up 2/3 of the free space. If you buy a 32gb iPhone, you expect the get roughly 32gb. And you do: you get 29ish. A consumer expecting 64 and seeing 23 would probably be a little mad.

Except due to the way drives and flash are partitioned, you won't get 32GB, you get the actual 29GB it comes out. After Apple partitions this into the System and User partitions. The user is where everything (apps,music and movies) live and System/Root is where the OS lives.

However, yes, your point on expecting something higher than 23GB is true. People have gotten used to Apple's method of having the vast majority of space available to them. So having a tablet with less than half the advertised space being able to be used is maddening to say the least. Just goes to show, that while Windows 8 is a nice tablet OS, a desktop OS ported into the tablet space is not the answer. Don't get me wrong, Win8 is nice.
 

Tubamajuba

macrumors 68020
Jun 8, 2011
2,188
2,446
here
You want a full PC experience? You'll pay with a full SSD.

I'm sure the people that insist on having every feature of their desktop or laptop crammed into a small tablet really won't mind this lack of storage; they'll just point to the fact that they can have external storage attached to the Surface Pro.

Even if it seems kind of ridiculous... to each their own.
 

jeremiah256

macrumors 65816
Aug 2, 2008
1,444
1,169
Southern California
Just goes to show, that while Windows 8 is a nice tablet OS, a desktop OS ported into the tablet space is not the answer. Don't get me wrong, Win8 is nice.

You bring up a good point: It can be argued that for both Google and Apple, their mobile OS is more or becoming more important than their desktop OS. Microsoft seems to be coming from the opposite direction. This hasn't worked out well for them in the past and I'm not sure they have much time to adapt. Especially with how Samsung, the face of Android, is exploding.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.