Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

boss.king

macrumors 603
Apr 8, 2009
6,394
7,647
From 9to5Mac

It's all about profits in the end.

It's from 9to5Mac, who's side do you expect them to take? This is about companies looking out for themselves. Why would T-Mobile help Apple to ban their Samsung products, especially when they don't even sell Apples product? Have the writers of that article considered that maybe they genuinely support Samsung in this issue and feel that Apple's case is unjustified?

The fact that Apple is even trying to have them banned is despicable, but that's a matter for another thread.
 

soco

macrumors 68030
Original poster
Dec 14, 2009
2,840
119
Yardley, PA
That matter is the whole point. T-Mobile and Verizon have taken clear stances on the grounds that their own business will be hurt, not moral grounds that Samsung is right and they want to defend them.

I'm not naive. I know business is business. It's just interesting to see such clear cut signs of what the world is all about.

I'd almost rather they defend Samsung and publicly state it's for the moral reasons, and backhandedly mean to defend their own products, sales and developing technologies.

But! I'll be nothing but honest and admit I'd be the first one to come here grumbling that I'd rather they were just honest about it.

I'm such a schmuck. :D
 

boss.king

macrumors 603
Apr 8, 2009
6,394
7,647
That matter is the whole point. T-Mobile and Verizon have taken clear stances on the grounds that their own business will be hurt, not moral grounds that Samsung is right and they want to defend them.

I'm not naive. I know business is business. It's just interesting to see such clear cut signs of what the world is all about.

I'd almost rather they defend Samsung and publicly state it's for the moral reasons, and backhandedly mean to defend their own products, sales and developing technologies.

But! I'll be nothing but honest and admit I'd be the first one to come here grumbling that I'd rather they were just honest about it.

I'm such a schmuck. :D

Haha, I'd probably do the same. Either way, I just don't like the fact that Apple is trying to have products banned rather than just competing.
 

Rodimus Prime

macrumors G4
Oct 9, 2006
10,136
4
I am willing to bet we will see AT&T follow suit with the same type of statement soon as well along with Sprint. They are going to make their stance. AT&T carriers some samsung phones and I know they are going to have more in their line up.
 

soco

macrumors 68030
Original poster
Dec 14, 2009
2,840
119
Yardley, PA
I am willing to bet we will see AT&T follow suit with the same type of statement soon as well along with Sprint. They are going to make their stance. AT&T carriers some samsung phones and I know they are going to have more in their line up.

Well yeah, now it's going to be the "in" thing to get behind Samsung. It serves so many fantastic purposes for a company getting behind them. You look like the guy that backs the underdog, you're standing up to Apple (and we all know everyone loves Apple but looks at them like a bully on the playground) and it protects your own business while playig nice with your competition by sort of saying, "Hey! What Apple is doing is uncool. I'm with YOU!" *pat on the back*

Yuck...
 

Sixtafoua

macrumors 6502
May 29, 2009
374
1
Boston, MA
Carriers in the U.S. do much worse than this. Who cares if T-Mobile doesn't side with apple. Does this even surprise anyone, i mean, apple hasn't been too nice to T-Mobile, who has openly said that they want the iPhone on their network, but apple is refusing to give it to them. Don't get so worked up about T-Mobile wanting to make profits, when there's this whole list of sucky things carriers do
 

Spectrum Abuser

macrumors 65816
Aug 27, 2011
1,377
48
I'm willing to say that AT&T will stay out of it. Staying neutral and not picking sides is the best thing to do when both companies combined make up an overwhelming majority of your sales.
 

RayK

macrumors 6502
Oct 13, 2005
345
15
True. Att will probably not help either and sprint won't say anything because they are stoked about getting the iPhone next week or the week after.
 

thejadedmonkey

macrumors G3
May 28, 2005
9,240
3,496
Pennsylvania
True. Att will probably not help either and sprint won't say anything because they are stoked about getting the iPhone next week or the week after.

If I were Sprint, I would side with Samsung. Chances are, Spring has a lot of Samsung product, where as they're legally obligated to get x units of iPhone 5 from Apple. And I'd be pretty ticked for having to wait 4 years for an iPhone.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.