Now that Apple has declared the original Retina MacBook Pro to be "vintage", I though I would write up a quick retrospective on the first Mac I ever owned.
I recently noticed that many people in this thread were critical of the price at the time. Yes, it was more expensive, but I'd argue justifiable because of the Retina display and the solid state drive.
This display was a huge improvement you'd notice immediately just looking at the MacOS UI, Safari, and optimized third-party apps, and made every other laptop on the market at the time feel outdated. Even text was incredibly crisp and strained the eyes less to read, it was simply impossible to ignore what a difference this display made.
PC manufacturers soon rushed to incorporate HiDPI displays into their products, which didn't show up until two years later and had to run Windows, which didn't handle HiDPI displays nearly as well as MacOS. And in 2012, most PCs with similar specs at a cheaper price point still came with spinning hard drives, which you simply can't argue is equal to pure-SSD storage.
The 2012 Retina MacBook Pro goes down as one of the best Apple products I have ever owned. Yes, it wasn't without issues (mine had image retention out of the box, and I had to take it in to get a display replacement under warranty, after which the issue didn't come back). But it was undeniably forward-thinking and ahead of its time, and handled anything I could throw at it. Having a built-in HDMI port and SD card slot was also convenient, while I didn't really miss the lack of a built-in DVD drive or ethernet port (did get an external Blu-ray burner, though the USB enclosure had failed some years ago and the drive itself now resides in my Mac Pro 5,1).
I got mine in August 2012 doing the back-to-school season, meaning it came with OS X Mountain Lion. Looking back, this was the perfect Apple product to introduce me to the ecosystem at the perfect time. In 2013, I got my first iPhone, the iPhone 5s. In 2014, I decided I wanted a desktop but didn't want to go back to a non-Retina display, so I waited for and got the first-gen 5K iMac when it was finally released. Unlike the iPhone, the iMac did end up having a few issues, most notably image retention that reappeared several times even after the display was replaced.
Today, the price Apple is charging is just as high as the original Retina MacBook Pro was in 2012, even adjusted for inflation. And what do we get in return? A Touch Bar of questionable benefit, even according to those who use it, that no PC manufacturer has seen the need to copy. A 0.1" thinner design that comes with more port compromises than the 0.24" thinner design of the 2012 Retina MacBook Pro. A keyboard that is 3-4x more likely to encounter problems than the previous models.
My 2012 Retina MacBook Pro is currently running the latest Mojave beta, as the oldest generation that Apple still supports. I don't see much to gain by moving to a newer model, though it's possible that will change when the 2018 hex-core refresh does finally come.
I recently noticed that many people in this thread were critical of the price at the time. Yes, it was more expensive, but I'd argue justifiable because of the Retina display and the solid state drive.
This display was a huge improvement you'd notice immediately just looking at the MacOS UI, Safari, and optimized third-party apps, and made every other laptop on the market at the time feel outdated. Even text was incredibly crisp and strained the eyes less to read, it was simply impossible to ignore what a difference this display made.
PC manufacturers soon rushed to incorporate HiDPI displays into their products, which didn't show up until two years later and had to run Windows, which didn't handle HiDPI displays nearly as well as MacOS. And in 2012, most PCs with similar specs at a cheaper price point still came with spinning hard drives, which you simply can't argue is equal to pure-SSD storage.
The 2012 Retina MacBook Pro goes down as one of the best Apple products I have ever owned. Yes, it wasn't without issues (mine had image retention out of the box, and I had to take it in to get a display replacement under warranty, after which the issue didn't come back). But it was undeniably forward-thinking and ahead of its time, and handled anything I could throw at it. Having a built-in HDMI port and SD card slot was also convenient, while I didn't really miss the lack of a built-in DVD drive or ethernet port (did get an external Blu-ray burner, though the USB enclosure had failed some years ago and the drive itself now resides in my Mac Pro 5,1).
I got mine in August 2012 doing the back-to-school season, meaning it came with OS X Mountain Lion. Looking back, this was the perfect Apple product to introduce me to the ecosystem at the perfect time. In 2013, I got my first iPhone, the iPhone 5s. In 2014, I decided I wanted a desktop but didn't want to go back to a non-Retina display, so I waited for and got the first-gen 5K iMac when it was finally released. Unlike the iPhone, the iMac did end up having a few issues, most notably image retention that reappeared several times even after the display was replaced.
Today, the price Apple is charging is just as high as the original Retina MacBook Pro was in 2012, even adjusted for inflation. And what do we get in return? A Touch Bar of questionable benefit, even according to those who use it, that no PC manufacturer has seen the need to copy. A 0.1" thinner design that comes with more port compromises than the 0.24" thinner design of the 2012 Retina MacBook Pro. A keyboard that is 3-4x more likely to encounter problems than the previous models.
My 2012 Retina MacBook Pro is currently running the latest Mojave beta, as the oldest generation that Apple still supports. I don't see much to gain by moving to a newer model, though it's possible that will change when the 2018 hex-core refresh does finally come.