What does the future for Microsoft look like... 5 years, 10 years from now?
Are their darkest days behind them or still ahead?
Are their darkest days behind them or still ahead?
Who would this "everyone" be? It is certainly not me. A report was published a couple of days ago that said that businesses were holding out on upgrades to Windows 7. They are sticking with XP for the near term. Take away me. Taking away Windows-using businesses. Who's left?Everyone is clamoring for Windows 7 right now. Beta/RC servers go down and so to the pre-order ones.
Who would this "everyone" be? It is certainly not me. A report was published a couple of days ago that said that businesses were holding out on upgrades to Windows 7. They are sticking with XP for the near term. Take away me. Taking away Windows-using businesses. Who's left?
Wirelessly posted (iPhone: Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 3_0 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/528.18 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile/7A341 Safari/528.16)
I think they are going to continue to loose in the consumer market but they will be fine in the business world.
Times are changing.Who would this "everyone" be? It is certainly not me. A report was published a couple of days ago that said that businesses were holding out on upgrades to Windows 7. They are sticking with XP for the near term. Take away me. Taking away Windows-using businesses. Who's left?
Times are changing.
http://www.tomshardware.com/news/windows-7-business-enterprise-upgrade,8251.html
http://hardmac.com/news/2009/07/15/microsoft-servers-go-bottom-up
I'd enjoy XP while you can.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/8149460.stm
Who would this "everyone" be? It is certainly not me. A report was published a couple of days ago that said that businesses were holding out on upgrades to Windows 7. They are sticking with XP for the near term. Take away me. Taking away Windows-using businesses. Who's left?
clevin, my Windows-loving friend, do you realize that you are proving my point? Businesses have lagged behind one or two versions of Windows for more than a decade. Added to this history is the current state of the economy. When these two circumstances are considered together, the notion that businesses will suddenly become less conservative and adopt Windows 7 soon after its release is a pipe dream.since when business world become quick in adopting any new version of any OS?
don't grab a report without presenting the context.
Take away business PCs, there are 1 billion-business pc left, and let me tell ya, its far bigger than apple's market share, by a lot.
clevin, my Windows-loving friend, do you realize that you are proving my point? Businesses have lagged behind one or two versions of Windows for more than a decade. Added to this history is the current state of the economy. When these two circumstances are considered together, the notion that businesses will suddenly become less conservative and adopt Windows 7 soon after its release is a pipe dream.
You love Windows so much that you don't understand that your individual licenses for Windows mean very little to Microsoft's bottomline. Microsoft's health depends on business licenses. For the past decade, business licenses have been a drag on its bottomline. Windows 7 will only make matters worse.
Hate to break it to you, but that is not how business works. I shouldn't say that I hate to break it you because I love it. At any rate, Microsoft has spent millions, if not billions, to develop Windows 7. Its inability to sell the product will mean that it cannot pay the cost of development with the sales of the product. Other products must subsidize Windows 7 development. However, you cannot spend the same dollar twice. Neither can Microsoft. Every dollar that Microsoft spends to subsidize Windows 7 is a dollar that Microsoft can't spend to improve the product that earned that dollar....
MS doesn't need to sell windows 7 like a rocket to business world, ...
Hate to break it to you, but that is not how business works. I shouldn't say that I hate to break it you because I love it. At any rate, Microsoft has spent millions, if not billions, to develop Windows 7. Its inability to sell the product will mean that it cannot pay the cost of development with the sales of the product. Other products must subsidize Windows 7 development. However, you cannot spend the same dollar twice. Neither can Microsoft. Every dollar that Microsoft spends to subsidize Windows 7 is a dollar that Microsoft can't spend to improve the product that earned that dollar.
I'd argue against that, at least not initially. Businesses are noted for being very stodgy about upgrades, and for the all the hubbub that was worked up about Vista it still got horrible press and relatively few upgrades - the State of Texas, for example. By the time many businesses decide to upgrade, Win 7 will be in Service Pack 2 or 3 and M$ will be announcing a new version. Upgrading will be slower still given the amount that will be upgrading from XP and all the hardware upgrades that entails (additional expense). Businesses are famously closed environments. A corporate setup can run years-old software with the only question being customer support, which in M$ case given they're so big in legacy support, will end up hurting their sales of Win 7. Win 7 is a major upgrade - it's a bigger jump than it was to XP.Your entire arguement is based on the idea that big business won't upgrade to 7, which they will.
Who would this "everyone" be? It is certainly not me. A report was published a couple of days ago that said that businesses were holding out on upgrades to Windows 7. They are sticking with XP for the near term. Take away me. Taking away Windows-using businesses. Who's left?