I remember when I first saw my frist iMac and I thught it looked like a masterpiece and how it stud out in the store it was the all white models
I remember looking at it and thinking this what inavasion looks liked
I feel that the Macs today just blend in and don’t stick out any more but that my view what’s urs
There are some things to keep in mind here.
First, inavasion (innovation?) can be defined as a new idea that leads to a breakthrough in its own field. Innovation is
not what looks pleasing, but if it were linked to aesthetics it would be about the process that generated that aesthetic.
In the case of the 'white' Macs - the iMac G4, MacBooks - the white polycarbonates were actually a knee-jerk reaction to the over saturation of transparent plastics and 'jelly bean' designs that eventually plagued consumer electronics in the early 2000s. They looked special because, like the iMac G3 and iBooks before them, there was nothing else out there like them.
But the devices of that 1997-2005 era all suffered from a variety of problems, to varying extents; the plastics cracked, they didn't transfer heat passively, easily got scratched, creaked, had to be assembled from multiple components (increasing the manufacturing process and making the devices less strong) and - most importantly - they were not environmentally friendly.
The move to aluminium and glass had its own effect that you describe - the products stood out and were like nothing else out there. If the Mac Studio were released today, it would have a similar effect, yet because we are accustomed to these materials there is no element of surprise.
In truth, this is functional design at its best. Apple is now creating Mac products that service utility before aesthetic, and that is more important when serving the needs of specific market segments. The new 24" iMac is a great example of this, because not only does everything defer to the display, but the range of colours and slim profile are designed to to be a happy, positive addition to a home or office.